Return to search

Influence, techniques, and therapeutic change : a study of the relative efficacy of the common components in psychotherapy

This study examines the relative efficacies of the specific and non-specific
factors in psychotherapy. Psychotherapy is conceptualized as
having three common components: the problem component whose essence is
low self-esteem; the interactional component which induces change through
social influence; and the treatment component which elicits change through
therapeutic techniques. The relative efficacy of each of these two change
components - influence (nonspecific factor) and therapeutic techniques
(specific factor) - is the central issue of the study. Four groups, each
of 20 subjects, were matched according to their low levels of self-esteem.
Each group was administered a different treatment in three, one-hour sessions
over a period of two weeks, designed to enhance self-esteem. The
four treatments involved: 1. An emphasis on techniques - cognitive
behavior - with social influence minimized through pre-session inductions;
2. An emphasis on social influence with no "usual" therapeutic techniques
other than talk; 3. An emphasis on both therapeutic techniques - cognitive-
behavior and social influence maximized through pre-session inductions;
and 4. A no-treatment control group. Social influence induction
scales indicated that pre-session inductions successfully maximized and
minimized conditions of influence. Post-treatment interview measures
indicated that the "full-therapy" - with both techniques and influence
maximized -was most effective. However, the therapies with maximized
social influence obtained significantly h1gher degrees of acceptance of
their therapy, and elicited significantly greater enhancement of self-esteem,
than did either the maximized technique, minimized influence
therapy, or the no-treatment, control group. The therapy with minimized
social influence showed no significant difference in its levels
of acceptance, or in its enhancement of self-esteem, from the control
group. These findings are interpreted to support the interactional
view of psychotherapy; seeing therapeutic change as an influence process,
and the therapeutic techniques as a means of further maximizing
that influence. A case is made for a re-emphasis in psychotherapy on
the interactional dynamics from a social psychological viewpoint. / Graduation date: 1982

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:ORGSU/oai:ir.library.oregonstate.edu:1957/38241
Date01 February 1982
CreatorsLynagh, Ian Lawrence
ContributorsBecker, Gerald
Source SetsOregon State University
Languageen_US
Detected LanguageEnglish
TypeThesis/Dissertation

Page generated in 0.0024 seconds