Return to search

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the relative efficacy and safety of treatment regimens for HIV-associated cerebral toxoplasmosis: is trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole a real option?

El texto completo de este trabajo no está disponible en el Repositorio Académico UPC por restricciones de la casa editorial donde ha sido publicado. / OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature to evaluate the efficacy and safety of therapies for cerebral toxoplasmosis in HIV-infected adults. The pyrimethamine plus sulfadiazine (P-S) combination is considered the mainstay therapy for cerebral toxoplasmosis and pyrimethamine plus clindamycin (P-C) is the most common alternative treatment. Although trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) has potential advantages, its use is infrequent. METHODS: We searched PubMed and four other databases to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies. Two independent reviewers searched the databases, identified studies and extracted data. Risk ratios (RRs) were pooled across studies using random-effects models. RESULTS: Nine studies were included (five RCTs, three retrospective cohort studies and one prospective cohort study). In comparison to P-S, treatment with P-C or TMP-SMX was associated with similar rates of partial or complete clinical response [P-C: RR 0.87; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.70-1.08; TMP-SMX: RR 0.97; 95% CI 0.78-1.21], radiological response (P-C: RR 0.92; 95% CI 0.82-1.03), skin rash (P-C: RR 0.81; 95% CI 0.56-1.17; TMP-SMX: RR 0.17; 95% CI 0.02-1.29), gastrointestinal impairment (P-C: RR 5.16; 95% CI 0.66-40.11), and drug discontinuation because of adverse events (P-C: RR 0.32; 95% CI 0.07-1.47). Liver impairment was more frequent with P-S than P-C (P-C vs. P-S: RR 0.48; 95% CI 0.24-0.97). CONCLUSIONS: The current evidence fails to identify a superior regimen in terms of relative efficacy or safety for the treatment of HIV-associated cerebral toxoplasmosis. Use of TMP-SMX as preferred treatment may be consistent with the available evidence and other real-world considerations. Larger comparative studies are needed. / Revisión por pares

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:PERUUPC/oai:repositorioacademico.upc.edu.pe:10757/622311
Date02 1900
CreatorsHernandez, Adrian V., Thota, P, Pellegrino, D, Pasupuleti, V, Benítes-Zapata, Vicente A., Penalva de Oliveira, AC, Vidal, JE, Deshpande, Abhishek
ContributorsSchool of Medicine; Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC); Lima Peru, Department of Medicine; Case Western Reserve University; Cleveland OH USA, Department of Infectious Diseases; Instituto de Infectologia Emilio Ribas; Sao Paulo Brazil, Department of Medicine; Case Western Reserve University; Cleveland OH USA, Center for Public Health Research; Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine; Universidad de San Martin de Porres; Lima Peru, Medicine Institute Center for Value Based Care Research; Cleveland Clinic; Cleveland OH USA, Department of Neurology; Instituto de Infectologia Emilio Ribas; Sao Paulo Brazil, Department of Neurology; Instituto de Infectologia Emilio Ribas; Sao Paulo Brazil
PublisherBlackwell Publishing Ltd
Source SetsUniversidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC)
LanguageEnglish
Detected LanguageEnglish
Typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
Formatapplication/pdf
Rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
Relationhttp://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/hiv.12402

Page generated in 0.0026 seconds