Return to search

FAT PARTITIONING AND SUBCLINICAL CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE AMONG WOMEN IN MENOPAUSAL TRANSITION

Obesity is one of the major risk factors of atherosclerosis and arterial stiffness. Recent evidence suggests detrimental effect of fat mass rather than overall body mass. Abdominal fat has been indicated to have more negative impact than other fat depots. We evaluated the impact of regional fat distribution on atherosclerosis and compared the variances explained by 11-different adiposity measures on atherosclerosis and arterial stiffness among bi-racial women in menopausal transition. All analyses were cross-sectional.
In the first analysis, adjusted for age, race, menopausal status, insulin, systolic blood pressure (SBP), triglycerides, height, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) and smoking; proportions of total (p= 0.03) and trunk fats (p= 0.03) were positively associated with common carotid adventitial diameter (AD). In contrast, proportion of leg fat was negatively associated with AD (p= 0.03). SBP attenuated the significant associations of total and regional fat distribution with carotid IMT.
In the second analysis, adjusted for age, race, menopausal status, height, SBP, low-density lipoprotein (LDL), HDL and insulin; waist circumference (WC) explained 25.2% of variance in IMT and 27.0% of variance in AD, while proportion of trunk fat explained 22.7% of variance in IMT and 25.1% of variance in AD, and area of visceral adipose tissue (VAT) explained 22.7% of variance in IMT and 25.8% of variance in AD.
When adjusted for age, race, menopausal status, height, SBP, insulin and C-reactive protein; WC, proportion of trunk fat and VAT explained comparable proportions of the variance in carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV) (WC, 9.0% of variance; proportion of trunk fat, 9.9%; and VAT, 10.3%). After adjusting for above mentioned variables, only proportion of total fat remained positively associated with cfPWV (p= 0.04).
Overall, our findings provide evidence for differential role of regional fat distribution on atherosclerosis but not on arterial stiffness. Moreover, WC seems to be as good as computed tomography (CT) and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measures of fat in explaining variability on atherosclerosis and arterial stiffness. Given the cost, difficulty in maintenance and exposure to radiation associated with CT and DXA, the use of WC in future research may have great public health significance.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:PITT/oai:PITTETD:etd-03192008-105945
Date27 June 2008
CreatorsDhakal, Sanjaya
ContributorsJanet M. Johnston, Maria M. Brooks, Kim Sutton-Tyrrell, Bret H. Goodpaster, Akira Sekikawa
PublisherUniversity of Pittsburgh
Source SetsUniversity of Pittsburgh
LanguageEnglish
Detected LanguageEnglish
Typetext
Formatapplication/pdf
Sourcehttp://etd.library.pitt.edu/ETD/available/etd-03192008-105945/
Rightsrestricted, I hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached hereto a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to University of Pittsburgh or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report.

Page generated in 0.0024 seconds