This study compared the relative utility of an intelligent tutoring system that uses procedure-based hints to a version that uses worked-out examples. The system, Andes, taught college level physics. In order to test which strategy produced better gains in competence, two versions of Andes were used: one offered participants graded hints and the other offered annotated, worked-out examples in response to their help requests. We found that providing examples was at least as effective as the hint
sequences and was more efficient in terms of the number of problems it took to obtain the same level of mastery.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:PITT/oai:PITTETD:etd-08092006-163545 |
| Date | 23 January 2007 |
| Creators | Ringenberg, Michael Aleksandr |
| Contributors | Kurt VanLehn, Kevin Ashley, Sandra Katz |
| Publisher | University of Pittsburgh |
| Source Sets | University of Pittsburgh |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | text |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Source | http://etd.library.pitt.edu/ETD/available/etd-08092006-163545/ |
| Rights | unrestricted, I hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached hereto a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to University of Pittsburgh or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report. |
Page generated in 0.002 seconds