碩士 / 國立體育學院 / 體育學系 / 83 / This dissertation aimed to investigate the development ofulum
for primary schools across the strait by using history study,
analysis and comparative study method,which was supplemented
with for any doubts and deficiency of data in order to
understand the between two parties. And conclusions were drawn
as below: 1. In mainland China, primary school physical
curriculum has been developed into the third (next to
literature,jor subject. The physique training has also combined
with thetic training standard" to highlight the preference of
sport games by communist regime. On the contrary, primary
school physicalaiwan was planned according to the curriculum of
Kuo-Ming Tangin response to the requirement of national policy
for strike-back to , developed into the present content of
entertainment, leisure. 2. After the open-door policy, the
preparation of criteria of physical curriculum in mainland
China was planned very muche ideology of the political leaders.
All institutes and personnel established organizations. The
"separated editing andeparation process, as an instructive
document, has been the guideline ofg materials, and the basis
of administration of physical education and tests.In
comparison, the preparation of criteria of primary curriculumin
Taiwan has been greatly influenced by the lifting of However,
all institutes and personnel belong to temporaryThe criteria,
as a guideline of choosing teaching material andce, is a legal
document with refraining power but is lack of
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:TW/083NCPES567011 |
| Creators | Li Chun Chieh, 李俊杰 |
| Contributors | Yeh Hsien Ching, 葉憲清 |
| Source Sets | National Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations in Taiwan |
| Language | zh-TW |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | 學位論文 ; thesis |
| Format | 178 |
Page generated in 0.0023 seconds