Comparison of beneficial evaluation for trench and trenchless methods apply to the storm water sewerage pipeline construction – A case study of Dao-Zhou road at He-Mei town in Taiwan. / 下水道工程採明挖工法及非掘削工法之效益評估-以和美鎮道周路雨水下水道工程為例

碩士 / 逢甲大學 / 土木及水利工程所 / 92 / ABSTRACT

The infrastructure is an important subject to evaluate competitive ability for a country. The sewer system is one of the important part of the infrastructure in modern city. However, because many underground
utilities do not implement sufficient detail plan and design, making every pipeline unit excavates the road to add or repair pipelines. As a result, causing the inhabitants to live inconveniently, retarding of the transportation, losing of the business and the environmental pollution, etc. Therefore, social cost caused by the important construction must be
considered in planning and designing period.

This research applying to the storm water sewer construction of Dao-Zhou road at He-Mei Town for case study. This project takes trench method but compared with trenchless methods to understand every cost (including social cost) and beneficial evaluation. The result finds that total cost including quantified social cost and direct cost is NT$44,664,689 in open cut and NT$38,309,779 in trenchless methods. This study results that trenchless method applies even to the countryside the impact of social cost are still lower than the trench method. It is a good reference for choosing the right method when design a pipeline construction project.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:TW/092FCU05017071
Date January 2004
CreatorsCHAO-CHOU LIN, 林昭洲
Contributorsnone, 江篤信
Source SetsNational Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations in Taiwan
Languagezh-TW
Detected LanguageEnglish
Type學位論文 ; thesis
Format118

Page generated in 0.0024 seconds