碩士 / 長榮大學 / 經營管理研究所 / 95 / Abstract
“The military is mainly for the fights and the fights are chiefly for the victory”.The Gulf War changes the operation thought entirely. The measure of fighting ability is transferred from quantity to quality. Through simplifying and transforming, modern fighting forces can be built. Do the military units have motive power to transform?With the changes and adjustments in national defense system, do members on department layers with environmental cognition change their organizational promise attitude and working behavior？ This is the main subject in this research.
The Ministry of National Defense(MND) organizes the policy in order to implement government''s Learning Organization, improve military officer quality, cooperate with the Ministry of Education’s “the learning society promotion” , and plan to build a career learning environment. Thus, this can enhance leaders’ knowledge capability. For many years, the Armed Forces have promoted learning organizations. Did the results and the management policy meet the personal and organizational needs? Did the personal growth help the organization? And this is another subject that this study focuses on.
Adopting questionnaire investigation, this study applies SPSS & AMOS programs as the analysis tools, and uses factor analysis, reliability analysis, descriptive statistics, T test, One-Way analysis of variance (One-Way ANOVA), correlation analysis, block regression analysis, cluster analysis, and SEM analysis for sampling. The purpose of this paper is to study and show the relationship between leadership style and organizational transfer construction Learning organization, and promoting organizational commitment and improving work behavior in military organizations. Taking the Air Force 1st Logistics Command as a sample, the research instrument of choice is a well-structured questionnaire distributed to 450 persons. The final sample’s size is 250; therefore, the rate of return for the questionnaire is 55%.
The study assumption includes five parts: (1) the difference of individual characteristics in all variables, (2) the correlations among variables, (3) the difference of variables from cluster to cluster, (4) the mediating effects between variables, and (5) the proof of theory models.
This study presents the following major findings:
1.There are strongly significant positive correlations among transformation, transactional and paternalistic leadership on constructing learning organization, promoting organizational commitment and improving work behavior in military organizations.
2.There are strongly significant positive correlations among organizational transfer on constructing learning organization, promoting organizational commitment and improving work behavior in military organizations.
3.There are positive and strongly significant correlations among constructing learning organization on promoting organizational commitment and improving work behavior in military organizations.
4.There are mediating effects in the relationship Transformation, transaction, paternalistic leadership and learning organization to organizational transferring, in the learning organization and organization committing to work behavior.
5.Constructing leadership style (organization transfer), learning organization, organizational commitment, work behavior is two obvious path models.
Based on the above, this study offers some suggestions to the military organizations, the military workers and the future researchers..
Keywords: Leadership Style, Organizational Change, Learning Organization, Organizational Commitment, Work Behavior.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:TW/095CJU05457026 |
| Date | January 2007 |
| Creators | Chih-Yuan Liao, 廖志遠 |
| Contributors | 謝介仁 |
| Source Sets | National Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations in Taiwan |
| Language | zh-TW |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | 學位論文 ; thesis |
| Format | 219 |
Page generated in 0.0018 seconds