Comparison of Training Impulse between Indoor and Outdoor Rowing / 室內與水上划船運動訓練衝量之比較

碩士 / 國立臺灣師範大學 / 體育學系 / 98 / Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the differences on the training loads between indoor and outdoor rowing by using the different training impulse (TRIMP) methods. The second purpose was to examine the relationships among the different TRIMP, and to develop a new method, blood lactate training impulse (BLa-TRIMP), to monitor the training load on rowing exercises. Methods: Twenty male volunteer rowers (age, 17.10 ± 0.16 years; height, 176.5 ± 6.12 cm; weight, 76.0 ± 7.46 kg) participated in this study. Each subject performed the incremental exercise test on the rowing ergometer to obtain the maximal heart rates, lactate threshold, onset of blood lactate accumulation, ventilatory threshold and respiratory compensation point for calculating the TRIMP. And then, all subjects performed the 2,000 meters indoor rowing test (IRT) and 2,000 meters outdoor rowing on water test (ORT) to measure the TRIMP. The heart rates (HR) and exercise time were monitored during the both rowing tests. Both rowing tests were retested again at least 48 hours after the first rowing test, and the test-retest reliability of the TRIMP calculated from the different methods was also assessed. Results: The results of ICC (intraclass correlation coefficient) indicated that both IRT and ORT had a moderate to high test-retest reliability (ICC = .50~.87). The normalized TRIMP, divided by exercise duration, in the IRT were significantly higher than those in the ORT (IRT vs. ORT: Foster’s method, 2.57 ± 0.26 vs. 2.31 ± 0.39 AU∙min-1, p < .05; Edwards’s method, 4.34 ± 0.39 vs. 3.97 ± 0.67 AU∙min-1, p < .05; BLa-TRIMP, 2.69 ± 0.20 vs. 2.44 ± 0.38 AU∙min-1, p < .05). However, the TRIMP which could not be normalized were significantly lower than those in ORT (IRT vs. ORT: basic TRIMP, 25.00 ± 5.3 vs. 25.81 ± 6.28 AU; session RPE TRIMP, 64.41 ± 5.36 vs. 69.90 ± 11.97 AU, p < .05). The duration of high intensity during the IRT was significantly higher than that during the ORT. The BLa-TRIMP significantly correlated to the other TRIMP methods either in the IRT or in the ORT (r = 47 ~ 76, p < .05). Conclusion: The exercise load and duration of high intensity during the 2,000-m indoor rowing exercise could be higher than outdoor, thus, the program design of the rowing exercise/training prescription should concern about the different physiological stimulus in the future. In addition, the BLa-TRIMP might be a reliable and available method to measure the training load of rowing exercise.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:TW/098NTNU5567082
CreatorsWang Chun-Yi, 王鈞逸
ContributorsCheng, Ching-Feng, 鄭景峰
Source SetsNational Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations in Taiwan
Languagezh-TW
Detected LanguageEnglish
Type學位論文 ; thesis
Format55

Page generated in 0.0017 seconds