碩士 / 臺灣大學 / 國家發展研究所 / 98 / Śrivijaya as a tributary state appears in Tang China materials from the 7th to 8th centuries and has been almost unanimously identified with San-fo-ch’i (三佛齊)in Song China documents. This article reexamines all of the related Śrivijaya records, exploring the civilization process of the early political powers in Malay waters between 6th and 11th centuries, and debating that the hypothesis of Śrivijaya kingdom in Palembang is false.
Prevailing opinions usually take the Śrivijaya as an ancient Kingdom “the empire of the Malacca Strait”, and consider it was the Kingdom where the pilgrim I-Tsing had lived, and the“Serbuza,”a polyphonic name, which Arab merchant recorded. In contrast to these accounts, this essay contends that the Śrivijaya was a polysemy, because the Peoples in ancient Malay peninsula had been under the impact of Indian civilization. There are various“(Śri)vijaya”in 6th to 9th centuries , and each “Vijaya”represents different local structure or history contingency.
The author argues that (Śri)vijaya should not be deemed a territory state. When Shih-li-fo-shih (室利佛誓) mentioned by the pilgrim I-Tsing in AD 695, it differs from those Śrivijaya engraved on the Inscription of Kedukan Bukit and the other Malay inscriptions at south east coast of Sumatra in A.D.683. The hypothesis “Le royaume de Çrivijaya” issued by Georges Cœdès could be challenged through reexamination of related Śrivijaya records including archaeological evidences, ecological research and related history materials.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:TW/098NTU05011043 |
| Date | January 2010 |
| Creators | Jin-Yi ,Liao, 廖晋儀 |
| Contributors | Zon-lin Tan, 陳宗仁 |
| Source Sets | National Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations in Taiwan |
| Language | zh-TW |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | 學位論文 ; thesis |
| Format | 185 |
Page generated in 0.002 seconds