The Inspection on Static Balance Ability of the Standing and Sitting Postures of Canoe Athletes / 輕艇專項運動員站姿與坐姿之靜態平衡能力檢測

碩士 / 國立東華大學 / 體育與運動科學系 / 99 / Objective: Through a study on parameters of Center of Pressure (COP) on force platform, this research is expected to compare the difference of Static Balance Ability of standing and sitting postures between canoe sprint athletes and students who major in Physical Education but with no speciality. By using a set of self-invented “Sitting Balance Inspection Chairs”, the sitting static balance ability is inspected, with an expectation to develop a set of equipment suitable for inspecting the sitting balance of the athletes adopting sitting postures. Approach: The 24 examinees are 12 male canoe sprint athletes from canoe K and 12 male students who major in Physical Education and with no specialty. Players are tested by standing on one leg in 4 different situations: with eyes opened, with eyes closed, standing on dominant leg, and standing on non-dominant leg to inspect their standing static balance ability. The examinees have to be tested on force platform by using 4 self-made balance inspection chairs with 4 different widths and heights. Each inspection is conducted for 3 times and each time lasts 20 seconds. By using the coordinates of COP captured by using software KwonGRF, COP average displacement radius, left-to-right maximal displacement, front-to-back maximal displacement, left-to-right average displacement speed, front-to-back average displacement speed and average displacement speed are all compared. SPSS for Windows 17.0 Chinese version is used as software for statistics. As for statistic methods, independent sample t is used to compare the difference of static balance ability on each test between canoe sprint athletes and students who major in Physical Education but with no specialty. The significance level is set as α=0.05. Results: On the balance test of standing on dominant leg with eyes opened and with eyes closed, the back-to-front average displacement speed and average displacement speed of canoe athletes are significantly less than those of the students who major in Physical Education but with no specialty (P<0.05). On the balance test of standing on non-dominant leg with eyes opened and with eyes closed, there’s no too much difference in COP parameters between canoe athletes and students who major in Physical Education but with no specialty (P<0.05). On the test of sitting balance by using chairs of 28 cm in length by 2.5 cm in width by 4 cm in height, the left-to-right maximal displacement of canoe athletes is significantly less than that of the students who major in Physical Education but with no specialty (P<0.05). On the test of sitting balance by using chairs of 28cm in length by 2.5 cm in width by 10 cm in height, the COP average displacement radius and COP left-to-right maximal displacement of canoe athletes are significantly less than those of the students who major in Physical Education but with no specialty (P<0.05). On the test of sitting balance by using chairs of 28 cm in length by 5 cm in width by 4 cm in height, COP left-to-right average displacement speed of canoe athletes is significantly less than the students who major in Physical Education but with no specialty (P<0.05). On the test of sitting balance test by using the chairs of 28 cm in length by 5 cm in width by 10 cm in height, the COP left-to-right maximal displacement, front-to-back maximal displacement and left-to-right average displacement of canoe athletes are significantly less than those of the students who major in Physical Education but with no specialty (P<0.05). Conclusions: 1. For standing balance ability, canoe athletes is better than the students who major in Physical Education but with no specialty in terms of front-to-back balance ability on dominant leg . In of static balance ability on. 2. The sitting static balance ability of Canoe athletes is better than that of the students who major in Physical Education but with no specialty, especially their left-to-right balance ability. 3. Chair size of 28 cm in length by 5cm in width by 10 cm in height is the most suitable for sitting balance inspection.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:TW/099NDHU5419018
Date January 2011
CreatorsWei-Ping Wu, 吳唯平
ContributorsLi-I Wang, 王令儀
Source SetsNational Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations in Taiwan
Languagezh-TW
Detected LanguageEnglish
Type學位論文 ; thesis
Format53

Page generated in 0.0136 seconds