碩士 / 輔仁大學 / 體育學系碩士班 / 102 / The research purpose aimed at exploring tactics used in 2000-meter rowing competition in 2012 London Olympic Games. Subjects included a total of 84 participating teams, among which were the first 6 winning teams in 14 competition categories. Based on tactic paradigm analysis, the findings were revealed as follows:
1. Of 84 participating teams, 61 teams (73%) adopted classic optimum paradigm, 21teams (25%) adopted fly and die paradigm, 2 teams (2%) adopted even split paradigm and none of the teams (0%) adopted conservative paradigm.
2. Of the champion teams in 14 competition categories, 10 teams (71%) adopted classic optimum paradigm, 4 teams (29%) adopted fly and die paradigm and none of the teams (0%) adopted either even split paradigm or conservative paradigm.
3. A more detailed look at 500-meter speed distribution, it can be indicated regarding tactics competing teams applied and the correlation between tactics use and results. The research findings imply that in rowing competitions, classic optimum paradigm was implemented most frequently (73%), followed by fly and die paradigm (29%).
The research concluded that in rowing competitions, the most efficient and frequently-used tactic was classic optimum paradigm in 2012 London Olympic Games. Such implications could be referred as to rowing competition pre-trainings in the years to come.
Keywords: Rowing competition category in Olympic Games / Tactic paradigm
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:TW/102FJU00567001 |
| Date | January 2014 |
| Creators | Ming-Chen Lu, 呂明珍 |
| Contributors | Hung-Yang Cheng, 陳鴻雁 |
| Source Sets | National Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations in Taiwan |
| Language | zh-TW |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | 學位論文 ; thesis |
| Format | 57 |
Page generated in 0.0145 seconds