碩士 / 國立政治大學 / 新聞研究所 / 102 / In March 2013, an international dispute directly related to Taiwan occurred—Japan unilaterally "nationalized" the Diaoyutai Islands. This dispute relates to the sovereignty controversy which invoked radical patriotic movements among the concerned countries. This study examined the Diaoyutai-related news coverage from United Daily News, China Times, Liberty Times and Apple Daily to compare the framing differences among the newspapers. Furthermore, this study tried to use the discourse analysis through the lens of realism, liberalism, and constructivism to discuss the international perspectives in news coverage.
The content analysis of the study had found that United Daily News and China Times, which are pro China-Taiwan unification position, tended to use the propaganda frame. They depended more on the official resources and separated “us v.s. others” distinction. Here two newspapers relied on the traditional war journalism report style. On the other hand, Liberty Times preferred “conflict frame” and didn’t show clearly of its position in the sovereign issue. Apple Daily framed Diaoyutai-related news with “human-interest frame”, focusing on the celebrities’ schedule and conflict scenes, showing the market-driven journalism.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:TW/102NCCU5383010 |
| Creators | 吳佳珍 |
| Contributors | 彭芸 |
| Source Sets | National Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations in Taiwan |
| Language | zh-TW |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | 學位論文 ; thesis |
| Format | 95 |
Page generated in 0.0059 seconds