碩士 / 國立臺南大學 / 國語文學系中國文學碩士在職專班 / 105 / The Classic of Mountains and Rivers records ancient myths and legends and geographical conditions. Views of this book varied from scholars to scholars, which can be classified into seven categories: text sorting out, checking and annotation; textual research on the contents; picture-text relation; research on the author; research on the writing time; the theory of nature; the theory of values. These seven categories are author-centered and text-centered while reader-centered discussion is hardly seen.
Wei-Jin, Northern and Southern dynasties are a time of political turbulence. However, from the point of vocal metaphysics and literature of immortals and ghosts, it is also considered as a time of literature consciousness. The Classic of Mountains and Rivers came out in Han Dynasty(BC202—AD220), followed by Guo Pu’s annotation in the Eastern Jin Dynasty (317-420) for the first time. Since then, the Classic of Mountains and Rivers had been attached to the fruit Guo Pu’s ideas. However, not only Guo Pu, but also at least another twenty six people had read the book in Wei-Jin, Northern and Southern dynasties and they had also put forward their own interpretations and gained various responses.
This article discusses thoughts of readers above from the perspective of reader’s reception, and presents writing responses through analysis of how people in that era interpreted the book. The author expects to make some meaningful contributions to the blank of relative research on the Classic of Mountains and Rivers
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:TW/105NTNT1045007 |
| Date | January 2017 |
| Creators | HUANG TA CHUN, 黃大峻 |
| Contributors | GONG YUNHENG, 龔韻蘅 |
| Source Sets | National Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations in Taiwan |
| Language | zh-TW |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | 學位論文 ; thesis |
| Format | 196 |
Page generated in 0.0095 seconds