碩士 / 輔仁大學 / 哲學系 / 106 / Heidegger pointed out that Western traditional metaphysics has forgotten Being, and the task of deconstruction is to arouse this forgetting. Calling forgotten in the context of Heidegger is a Warning, warning whether there are any forgotten things in all clear and clear memories, and this warning in the defensive sense is already in its phenomenon before 《Being and Time》 Carry out the concept of "Formal Indication". Recollections are not a recurrence of forgetting things, but a gathering of forgetting things in a forgotten call, and all movements of thought are rooted in the context of forgetting and remembering. This paper attempts to point out how Heidegger's deconstruction disassembles the vigilance of "Formal Indication", and then returns to the oblivion in the memory of thought, because only in this return the summon of the Oblivion is answered. When Heidegger's method of deconstruction is carried out through hermeneutics, what makes hermeneutics possible is this memory of forgetting. Just because Being is hidden in the forgotten, deconstruction evokes this forgetting in the vigilance, and the questioning of existence promises an Illuminate’s Unconcealedness in the context of this forgetting and recollection.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:TW/106FJU00259003 |
| Date | January 2018 |
| Creators | LEE, WAI-MING, 李偉銘 |
| Contributors | CHIN, KEN-PA, 曾慶豹 |
| Source Sets | National Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations in Taiwan |
| Language | zh-TW |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | 學位論文 ; thesis |
| Format | 99 |
Page generated in 0.0022 seconds