碩士 / 國立成功大學 / 歷史學系 / 106 / After The World War II, the superpower struggle in the East Asian region highlighted Taiwan’s key strategic importance in the “first island chain”. The ideological confrontation between the United States and the Soviet Union created the 1949 split between the two sides of the Strait. The government of cross-strait each adhered to the principle of one China and took the posture of being most qualified to China’s representation and launched the 22 years of struggle for the United Nations. In 1971, the UN resolution 2758 was issued that the only Chinese government has been recognized and identified as the One China principle of the People's Republic of China in the world. Since 46 years ago, the United States, China, and Taiwan have been readjusting the One China principle of foundation and established for the Taiwan Strait System of tripartite interaction.
The cold war gradually ended in the late 1980s and the possibility of military conflicts in the Taiwan Straits gradually decreased. Driven by mutual exchanges between non-governmental and social groups on both sides of the Taiwan Strait, the governments of cross-strait has been adjusted and built new government institutions. The SEF and the ARATS are the only authorized parties to conduct dialogue, communication, and exchanges. In 1992, the governments of cross-strait hold formal discussion for transactional negotiations. As a result, the governments of cross-strait ended in a manner of “say each other” and “unhappy”. After the 1993 Koo-Wang Talk, whether or not the governments of cross-strait had a consensus on the principle of One China. The governments of cross-strait are still different interpretations and perceptions. As a result, the development of cross-strait relations has seen in crisis situation more than relaxation.
In 2000, the political parties in Taiwan have been alternated for the first time. The DPP took over the highest authority of government leadership. The cross-strait relations went from the originally “cold peace” to a “zero-sum” relationship. The United States and the People's Republic of China in consideration of the interests of their respective countries, mutually restrain the Chen Shui-bian government from highlighting the Taiwan subject cross-strait policy. Through the process of balancing the situation, the KMT and PFP political alliance has used the so-called “the 1992 Consensus” to find the opportunity to complete the third cooperation with the Communist Party. And the KMT and PFP political alliance has been able to return to the top leadership of the Taiwan government. After the second round of political party alternation in Taiwan changed from 2008 to 2016, both the KMT and the CCP government in the framework of One China principle went from economic and trade integration to politically unanimous links, and deliberately confirmed the so-called the 1992 consensus. So the so-called of the 1992 consensus was difficult to shake the political noose for the Cross-strait Relations.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:TW/106NCKU5493008 |
| Date | January 2018 |
| Creators | Yu ChangJang, 張育菖 |
| Contributors | Woody Cheng, 鄭梓 |
| Source Sets | National Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations in Taiwan |
| Language | zh-TW |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | 學位論文 ; thesis |
| Format | 260 |
Page generated in 0.007 seconds