Return to search

Alternatives to protect the OTC market againist counterparty risk

This thesis assesses the implications that netting practices, collateralization and centralization of the risk in Central Counterparties (CCPs) have on the structure of Over-the-Counter (OTC) derivative market and determine when those practices are plausible alternatives to protect OTC market against counterparty risk.
Benefits and disadvantages are addressed from a general and a specific perspective. The general scope discusses the positive and negative implications that affect the structure of OTC derivative market as a whole, while the specific scope include the direct implications for market participants from a narrower point of view.
The theoretical framework is based mainly on literature from books, journal papers, regulative approaches from financial authorities and statistical data from the BIS and ISDA. The outcomes from the three assessments are:
(i) Bilateral and multilateral netting is justified when the reduction of counterparty credit risk and cost advantages obtained from closing-out positions are greater than the legal risk and operational risk;
(ii) The risks and costs derived from collateral are justified when there is a clear reduction of counterparty credit risk and capital requirements; when collateral is well segregated from other companies´ assets and is liquid enough to cover exposure; and when there are already risk management practices in place that control the increase of other risks;
(iii) Centralizing risk in CCPs is justified if the reduction of counterparty risk by mutualising losses of counterparties is greater than the potential systemic risk from the centralization of trading and if the reduction of operational risk, market risk, legal risk, capital requirements, costs and time invested in management practices are greater than the potential benefits obtained in bilateral agreements outside of a CCP.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:UDLA-Thesis/oai:ciria.udlap.mx:u-dl-a/tesis/5051015879681
Date12 December 2012
CreatorsMendoza Noriega, Maria Teresa
ContributorsMtro. Rafael Galindo Ernst, Dr. Raúl Bringas Nostti, Dra. Robyn Lynn Johnson Carlson
PublisherUniversidad de las Américas Puebla
Source SetsUDLA-Thesis
LanguageEnglish
Detected LanguageEnglish
TypeElectronic Thesis or Dissertation, Proyecto Integrador
Formatapplication/pdf, text/html
CoverageLicenciatura

Page generated in 0.0016 seconds