One fundamental purpose of American education is to provide an equal and quality education for all children. Unfortunately, evidence that schools are failing to meet this important challenge is abundant. One barrier to equal educational opportunity is the practice of ability grouping, which is widespread despite research showing that it does not consistently benefit any group of students and may be detrimental to students in lower-ability groups. Teachers favor ability grouping, but little is known about why. Two major research questions guide the present study: (1) How do Coalition elementary schools group students for instruction? (2) What do Coalition elementary school teachers perceive are the effects of existing grouping practices on student learning? The study employs qualitative research methods to describe the practices and perceptions of a particular group of principals and teachers in relation to school and classroom grouping. Data are drawn from 47 interviews with principals and teachers representing Grades K-6 in 12 elementary schools associated with the Coalition for School Improvement. Data show that principals in all 12 schools attempt to create heterogeneous classes. However, teachers create groups within classes to reduce the heterogeneity of student abilities in some subjects. Usually, reading is taught in ongoing, similar-ability groups. Most other lessons are introduced to entire classes and are followed by ad hoc similar-ability groups for a specific skill lesson or mixed-ability groups for peer tutoring or cooperative learning. Teachers defend similar-ability groups on instructional grounds, usually to maintain appropriate content and pace in reading and math. They defend mixed-ability groups because of social benefits to children, usually in science and social studies. Teachers' perceptions of groupings' effects on students' personal development are mixed. The study concludes that within-class ability groups operate with different learning conditions for different groups. Teachers hold unexamined assumptions and are remote from research linking grouping and student learning. Grouping decisions also are influenced by forces outside of teachers' control, including mandates, norms, and requirements
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:UMASS/oai:scholarworks.umass.edu:dissertations-1199 |
| Date | 01 January 1989 |
| Creators | Harrison, Anne Elizabeth |
| Publisher | ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst |
| Source Sets | University of Massachusetts, Amherst |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | text |
| Source | Doctoral Dissertations Available from Proquest |
Page generated in 0.0016 seconds