This thesis concerns doubly robust (DR) estimation in missing data contexts. Previous research is not unanimous as to which estimators perform best and in which situations DR is to be preferred over other estimators. We observe that the conditions surrounding comparisons of DR- and other estimators vary between dierent previous studies. We therefore focus on the effects of three distinct aspects of study design on the performance of one DR-estimator in comparison to outcome regression (OR). These aspects are sample size, the way in which models are misspecified, and the degree of association between the covariates and propensities. We find that while there are no drastic eects of the type of model misspecication, all three aspects do affect how DR compares to OR. The results can be used to better understand the divergent conclusions of previous research.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:UPSALLA1/oai:DiVA.org:umu-136286 |
| Date | January 2017 |
| Creators | Ecker, Kreske |
| Publisher | Umeå universitet, Statistik |
| Source Sets | DiVA Archive at Upsalla University |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Student thesis, info:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis, text |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
Page generated in 0.0021 seconds