Return to search

Design and Evaluation of an Underactuated Lower Body Exoskeleton

An underactuated exoskeleton design for walking assistance is presented and evaluated. The exoskeleton uses one motor per leg and makes use of a pantograph to reduce the overall profile and allow the exoskeleton to closely follow the shape of the user's leg. Support is provided between the ball of the user's foot and their waist by compressing a spring in parallel with the user's leg during Stance Phase. The exoskeleton has a mass of 14.0 kg (30.8 lbs) and was tested up to a supplied spring force of 323.6 N (72.75 lbf) which equates to around 161.8 N (36.38 lbf) of assistive force at the waist. Range of motion tests showed minimal restriction at the knee and ankle, but some restriction of the hip. Human subject experiments using a simple gait detection method based on GRF at walking speeds from 0.45 m/s to 1.12 m/s (1.0 mph to 2.5 mph) were performed and showed an increase in the time between actual heel strike and predicted heel strike of approximately 0.05 seconds to 0.1 seconds. Lastly, calculations are presented examining the effect of exoskeleton assistance on the biological joint moments and optimizing the actuator design to reduce power consumption. The actual performance of the exoskeleton is compared with the calculations based on the joint angles during a typical walking cycle. / Master of Science / A design for an exoskeleton capable of providing walking assistance without requiring a motor for every joint is presented and evaluated. The exoskeleton uses one motor per leg and makes use of a pantograph to reduce the required size and allow the exoskeleton to closely follow the shape of the user's leg. Support is provided between the ball of the user's foot and their waist by compressing a spring attached beside the user's leg while the user's foot is on the ground. The exoskeleton weighs 14.0 kg (30.8 lbs) and was tested up to a supplied spring force of 323.6 N (72.75 lbf) which equates to around 161.8 N (36.38 lbf) of assistive force at the waist. Range of motion tests showed minimal restriction at the knee and ankle, but some at the hip. Testing with a human participant using a simple method for determining when to apply support and remove it based on the forces measured at the user's foot were performed at walking speeds of 0.45 m/s to 1.12 m/s (1.0 mph to 2.5 mph). These tests showed an increase in the time between when the heel of the foot initially hits the ground and when the exoskeleton code determined that it occurred of approximately 0.05 seconds to 0.1 seconds. Lastly, calculations are presented examining how exoskeleton assistance affects what is felt at the joints of the user and determining what spring stiffness would best reduce the power required from the motors. The actual performance of the exoskeleton is compared with the calculations based on the joint angles during normal human walking.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:VTETD/oai:vtechworks.lib.vt.edu:10919/110503
Date08 June 2022
CreatorsBiggers, Zackory James
ContributorsMechanical Engineering, Asbeck, Alan T., Akbari Hamed, Kaveh, Nussbaum, Maury A.
PublisherVirginia Tech
Source SetsVirginia Tech Theses and Dissertation
LanguageEnglish
Detected LanguageEnglish
TypeThesis
FormatETD, application/pdf
RightsIn Copyright, http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/

Page generated in 0.0018 seconds