Return to search

A Forty-Nine Day Evaluation of Bio-Mos® Replacement of Roxarsone in a Commerically Based Broiler Feeding Program

A study was conducted to investigate the effects of roxarsone and Bio-Mos® on broiler production, gut morphology and bone strength. Three thousand and ten broilers were randomly assigned to 1 of 5 dietary corn-soybean meal based treatments: 1) negative control (NEG), basal diet; 2) positive control (POS; NEG + 27 ppm Bacitracin MD); 3) roxarsone (ROX; POS + 50 ppm of roxarsone); 4) Bio-Mos® (BIO; POS + 0.15 and 0.5% Bio-Mos® added during the starter and grower periods, respectively); 5) Bio-Mos®+All-Lac XCL (BIO+LAC; POS + 0.2, 0.1, and 0.05% Bio-Mos® during the starter, grower and finishing periods, respectively and 0.25g All-Lac XCL/bird sprayed at hatchery). On day 14, 7 of the 14 replicate pens/treatment were challenged with Eimeria maxima (3 x 104 oocysts/bird). Tibias were collected on day 28 and 49 to determine bone-breaking strength. Non-challenged birds had higher body weight gains (BWG) and lower feed conversion (FCR) from day 0 to 49 than challenged birds (P < 0.05). Jejunal crypt depth was increased in challenged broilers compared to non-challenged broilers at 28 days-of-age (P < 0.05). From day 0 to 35, ROX birds had lower BWG and FI than BIO and BIO+LAC birds (P < 0.05), while FCR was similar. Supplementing roxarsone resulted in reduced feed intake and BWG, but no significant differences were noted in FCR compared to feeding Bio-Mos®. ROX fed broilers had decreased ileal crypt depth compared to all other dietary treatments (P < 0.05). Muscle As concentration was lower than FDA allowable limits in broilers fed ROX without a withdrawal period at 28 days-of-age. Including roxarsone or Bio-Mos® did not generally improve production compared to broilers fed the negative diet. / Master of Science

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:VTETD/oai:vtechworks.lib.vt.edu:10919/44134
Date28 August 2007
CreatorsHerfel, Tina Marie
ContributorsAnimal and Poultry Sciences, Novak, Curtis L., McElroy, Audrey P., Pierson, Frank William
PublisherVirginia Tech
Source SetsVirginia Tech Theses and Dissertation
Detected LanguageEnglish
TypeThesis
Formatapplication/pdf
RightsIn Copyright, http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
RelationTinaHerfelThesisRevision.pdf

Page generated in 0.0024 seconds