Return to search

Effect of chilling, hydrogen cyanamide, hot water and bud scale removal on bud break of 'Tifblue' rabbiteye blueberry

Temperate deciduous fruit trees have poor and delayed bud break when they are grown in warm areas. The delay is due to a lack of the chilling which is required to break bud endodormancy. Bud endodormancy can be overcome in some species by treatments such as H<sub>2</sub>CN<sub>2</sub>, heat, and bud scale removal. We tested the effects of chilling, H<sub>2</sub>CN<sub>2</sub>, heat, and removing scales on bud break of floral and vegetative buds of 'Tifblue' rabbiteye blueberry (Vaccinium ashei Reade).

Hydrogen cyanamide was effective in promoting floral bud break of 'Tifblue' only on whole plants, at chilling exposures between 300 to 500 hours. However, vegetative bud break was increased by H<sub>2</sub>CN<sub>2</sub> at a wider range of ~hilling exposures than floral buds in both whole plants and cut shoots. Optimum vegetative bud break was induced by H<sub>2</sub>CN<sub>2</sub> at 125 and 250 mM for whole plants and cut shoots, respectively. Hydrogen cyanamide was highly phytotoxic to floral buds compared to vegetative buds. However, floral buds of whole plants became tolerant to H<sub>2</sub>CN<sub>2</sub> as chilling increased. Injury to vegetative buds was significant only at 500 mM H<sub>2</sub>CN<sub>2</sub>.

The chilling requirement for 'Tifblue' floral buds of whole plants was 500 hours. In contrast, vegetative buds did not have a significant relationship with chilling exposure in either cut shoots or whole plants.

Heat treatment was effective in promoting floral bud break of cut shoots only at 190 chilling hours at 30 minutes heat exposure. Heat (47°C) for I hr was effective in promoting vegetative bud break, but the effectiveness varied with chilling level and depended on time of heat exposure. Bud scale removal did not promote floral bud break, but increased vegetative bud break, although not significant compared to control.

Finally, we discovered that vegetative buds remained dormant even after they had received more than adequate chilling. However, both H<sub>2</sub>CN<sub>2</sub> treatment and floral bud removal resulted in increased vegetative bud break, although the effect of H<sub>2</sub>CN<sub>2</sub> was less than floral bud removal. This suggests that vegetative buds were inhibited by floral buds and that H<sub>2</sub>CN<sub>2</sub> could partially overcome this paradormant effect. / Master of Science

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:VTETD/oai:vtechworks.lib.vt.edu:10919/44736
Date12 September 2009
CreatorsSaad, Mohd. Ridzuan Mohd
ContributorsHorticulture, Weiser, Russell L., Kushad, Mosbah, Marini, Richard P.
PublisherVirginia Tech
Source SetsVirginia Tech Theses and Dissertation
LanguageEnglish
Detected LanguageEnglish
TypeThesis, Text
Formatix, 50 leaves, BTD, application/pdf, application/pdf
RightsIn Copyright, http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
RelationOCLC# 27701513, LD5655.V855_1992.S232.pdf

Page generated in 0.0043 seconds