To appear in Government Information Quarterly sometime in 2006 or early 2007. / This paper develops a framework to assess the public information provided on program level government agency Websites. The framework incorporates three views of government information obligations stemming from different assumptions about citizen roles in a democracy: the private citizen view, the attentive citizen view, and the deliberative citizen view. The framework is employed to assess state Websites containing controversial policy information about chronic wasting disease, a disease effecting deer and elk in numerous U.S. states and Canada. Using the framework as a guide, the paper considers what information agencies should provide given the three different views of government information obligations. The paper then outlines the costs and benefits of fulfilling each view of government information obligations including issues of limited resources, perceived openness and credibility, press coverage, and policy making control.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:arizona.edu/oai:arizona.openrepository.com:10150/105318 |
| Date | January 2006 |
| Creators | Eschenfelder, Kristin R., Miller, Clark A. |
| Source Sets | University of Arizona |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Preprint |
Page generated in 0.0017 seconds