ITC/USA 2005 Conference Proceedings / The Forty-First Annual International Telemetering Conference and Technical Exhibition / October 24-27, 2005 / Riviera Hotel & Convention Center, Las Vegas, Nevada / Hardware implementing forward error correction (FEC) is currently available for utilization by the
airborne telemetry system designer. This paper will discuss the potential benefits along with drawbacks
when using this technology. Laboratory testing is supplemented with real-world flight testing.
Performance results comparing FEC and non-FEC systems are presented for both IRIG-106 Pulse Code
Modulation/Frequency Modulation, PCM/FM, (or Continuous Phase Frequency Shift Keying, CPFSK,
with filtering, or ARTM Tier 0) and Shaped Offset Quadrature Phase Shift Keying, Telemetry Group
version (SOQPSK-TG or ARTM Tier I) waveforms.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:arizona.edu/oai:arizona.openrepository.com:10150/604798 |
| Date | 10 1900 |
| Creators | Temple, Kip |
| Contributors | Air Force Flight Test Center |
| Publisher | International Foundation for Telemetering |
| Source Sets | University of Arizona |
| Language | en_US |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | text, Proceedings |
| Rights | Copyright © International Foundation for Telemetering |
| Relation | http://www.telemetry.org/ |
Page generated in 0.0025 seconds