This thesis examines the effects of reducing segmentation and commitment to increase the level of investor protection on expected return, risk, trading volume and the level of disclosure of cross-listed firms. Previous studies have mainly focused on foreign firms listed in the US and produced inconclusive evidence regarding the benefits of cross-listing. Also, the existing research failed to adequately explain the reason behind the drop in abnormal return (AR) reported in all cross-listing studies, and whether it is associated with the timing of cross-listing. In addition, the research failed to explain the choice of foreign listing between regulated (AMEX, NASDAQ, NYSE, and LSE) and unregulated exchanges (OTe and PORTAL). Moreover, the lack of empirical investigation of the relation between cross-listing and increasing the level of investor makes this research important. My results show a significant decline in share price after the cross-listing, evidenced by the drop in abnormal return (AR). I find that the drop in AR is related to firm performance, suggesting that managers cross-list in a period of good performance to take advantage of the overvaluation of share price. I also report no relation between cross-listing and the commitment to increase the level of in-vest or protection. The logit model suggests that firms with poor investor protection are more likely to cross-list on unregulated exchanges to avoid the costs associated with listing on regulated exchanges. My results also reveal that foreign firms from good investor protection environments are traded more, before and after cross-listing, than foreign firms from poor investor protection environments. This evidence suggests no relation between foreign trading and the level of investor protection in the firm's home market. In terms of increasing disclosure, the analysis shows that the level of disclosure does not increase after cross-listing, irrespective of the location of cross- 1 listing. The results are also consistent across foreign firms from civil and common law countries. When comparing between cross-listed and non-cross-listed firms, the analysis shows no significant statistical difference. The above results provide new thinking on cross-listing, especially in respect of the relation between the time of cross listing and firm performance. Moreover, the evidence casts doubt on previous results that favour the investor protection (bonding) hypothesis, and question its validity.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:bl.uk/oai:ethos.bl.uk:428641 |
| Date | January 2004 |
| Creators | Abdallah, Abed Al-Nasser |
| Publisher | Lancaster University |
| Source Sets | Ethos UK |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Electronic Thesis or Dissertation |
Page generated in 0.0233 seconds