Five case studies are analysed in depth and other investigations are carried out in order to answer questions concerned with: (i) the nature of the distributions which are output from risk evaluation models; (ii) the important features of the distributions which are input to risk evaluation models; (iii) the accuracy with which different methods for assessing subjective probability distributions are capable of providing the inputs to risk evaluation models; (iv) the way in which dependencies should be dealt with in risk evaluation models; (v) the extent to which it is possible to distinguish important probability assessments from unimportant probability assessments in risk evaluation models.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:bl.uk/oai:ethos.bl.uk:459980 |
| Date | January 1976 |
| Creators | Hull, J. C. |
| Contributors | Cass, T. : Adelson, R. M. |
| Publisher | Cranfield University |
| Source Sets | Ethos UK |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Electronic Thesis or Dissertation |
| Source | http://dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk/handle/1826/4593 |
Page generated in 0.0023 seconds