The present work focuses on preliminary weight estimation methods that enable the feasibility studies of novel aero engines. The key contributions can be found in the analysis of the existing preliminary weight estimation methods, the development of a new preliminary weight estimation method and the study on the feasibility of a Geared Turbofan (GTF) engine. In more detail, the existing preliminary weight estimation methods are examined in the first part of the thesis, aiming to define their suitability for current turbofan engines, but also for future engine arrangements. For this purpose, they are examined not only quantitatively, to verify their accuracy, but also qualitatively to figure out if they are able to reflect the key thermodynamic and design parameter variations on weight. Apart from NASA WATE no method achieves either the required accuracy, or simulates the weight trends. Realising the need for a more accurate, robust, flexible and extensible method, a new "component based" method that performs basic component design to estimate engine weight, is devised. Its accuracy is verified by comparing the whole engine weight prediction and estimated component design against the publicly available data of two major turbofan engines and the weight predictions of existing weight estimation methods. ATLAS, the tool based on the above method was used to estimate weight over a range of Bypass Ratio (BPR) and Turbine Entry Temperature (TET) values for a Direct Drive Turbofan (DDTF) and a GTF two spool arrangement, reaching the following conclusions: The adjustments of Low Pressure Turbine (LPT) number of stages or geometry are not sufficient, if high stage isentropic efficiency values are targeted at high BPR values. For the examined engine model, with the given weight estimation methodology, the weight reduction, when a gearbox is introduced at a DDTF, depends on the reduction of LPT stages, with the other components having negligible impact. However, it should be noted that a constant fan diameter was assumed for both configurations. A fan loss model and more detailed weight estimation of frames, shafts and control and accessories is required to verify this conclusion. The comparison of a DDTF and a GTF engine is representative only if the cycles corresponding to the installed performance optima are considered. Engines with the same thermodynamic cycle could only be compared when the optima cannot be reached, due to geometry restrictions.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:bl.uk/oai:ethos.bl.uk:650149 |
| Date | January 2014 |
| Creators | Lolis, Periklis |
| Contributors | Sethi, Vishal; Pilidis, Pericles |
| Publisher | Cranfield University |
| Source Sets | Ethos UK |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Electronic Thesis or Dissertation |
| Source | http://dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk/handle/1826/9244 |
Page generated in 0.0055 seconds