There have been leaps in both fields of epigenetics and reproductive technology.
This has culminated in the production of bi-maternal mouse offspring through a few studies utilizing direct gene mutations as functional-imprints. While these genetic interventions result in positive results, it has yet to be described, in full, what mechanisms underlie the epigenetic barriers to human gynogenesis.
Between maternal and paternal imprints, differences in methylation patterns of CpG island promoters, non-coding regions, microsatellites, transposons, and histones result in differences in higher order chromatin structure, which ultimately impacts expression of certain genes. While the necessary components of a minimal paternal epigenetic program are described, programming this imprint onto m2, a hypothetical, experimentally-produced maternal genome with a paternal epigenome is still not elucidated. Sequential timing of imprint acquisition and maintenance and the numerous regulatory factors associated with them illuminate how difficult potential assisted reproductive epigenetic interventions will be. Other processes like histone-protamine exchange which also plays a crucial factor in structural regulation of imprints, as well as signaling through and after fertilization, pose logistical problems to creating a gynogenote through epigenetic means.
Lastly, ethics surrounding the introduction of dangerous mutations and epialleles into the human population add another wall of caution and hesitance in exploring human gynogenesis as a reproductive technology.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:bu.edu/oai:open.bu.edu:2144/34885 |
| Date | 21 February 2019 |
| Creators | Nguyen, Olivia D. |
| Contributors | Offner, Gwynneth, Latham, Keith |
| Source Sets | Boston University |
| Language | en_US |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Thesis/Dissertation |
Page generated in 0.0024 seconds