Return to search

Individual variability in value-based decision making: behavior, cognition, and functional brain topography

Decisions often require weighing the costs and benefits of available prospects. Value-based decision making depends on the coordination of multiple cognitive faculties, making it potentially susceptible to at least two forms of variability. First, there is heterogeneity in brain organization across individuals in areas of association cortex that exhibit decision-related activity. Second, a person’s preferences can fluctuate even for repetitive decision scenarios. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and behavioral experiments in humans, this project explored how these distinct sources of variability impact choice evaluation, localization of valuation in the brain, and the links between valuation and other cognitive phenomena.

Group-level findings suggest that valuation processes share a neural representation with the “default network” (DN) in medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) and posterior cingulate cortex (PCC). Study 1 examined brain network variability in an open dataset of resting-state fMRI (n=100) by quantitatively testing the hypothesis that the spatial layout of the DN is unique to each person. Functional network topography was well-aligned across individuals in PCC, but highly idiosyncratic in mPFC. These results highlighted that the apparent overlap of cognitive functions in these areas should be evaluated within individuals.

Study 2 examined variability in the integration of rewards with subjective costs of time and effort. Two computerized behavioral experiments (total n=132) tested how accept-or-reject foraging decisions were influenced by demands for physical effort, cognitive effort, and unfilled delay. The results showed that people’s willingness to incur the three types of costs differed when they experienced a single type of demand, but gradually converged when all three were interleaved. The results could be accounted for by a computational model in which contextual factors altered the perceived cost of temporal delay.

Finally, Study 3 asked whether the apparent cortical overlap between valuation effects and the DN persisted after accounting for individual variability in brain topography and behavior. Using fMRI scans designed to evoke valuation and DN-like effects (n=18), we reproduced the idiosyncratic network topography from Study 1, and observed valuation-related effects in individually identified DN regions. Collectively, these findings advance our taxonomic understanding of higher-order cognitive processes, suggesting that seemingly dissimilar valuation and DN-related functions engage overlapping cortical mechanisms.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:bu.edu/oai:open.bu.edu:2144/42957
Date31 August 2021
CreatorsToro Serey, Claudio A.
ContributorsMcGuire, Joseph T.
Source SetsBoston University
Languageen_US
Detected LanguageEnglish
TypeThesis/Dissertation
RightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

Page generated in 0.0032 seconds