Lui, Nga Kwan. / Thesis (M.Phil.)--Chinese University of Hong Kong, 2007. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 164-170). / Abstracts in English and Chinese. / ABSTRACT --- p.i / ACKNOWLEDGEMENT --- p.iv / Chapter CHAPTER 1 --- INTRODUCTION --- p.1 / Chapter 1.1 --- Two Writing Approaches Practiced in Hong Kong Classrooms --- p.1 / Chapter 1.1.1 --- A Glimpse of the Situation of Hong Kong Secondary School Classrooms --- p.1 / Chapter 1.1.2 --- A Glimpse of the Situation of Hong Kong University Classrooms --- p.6 / Chapter 1.2 --- Different Roles of Teacher Feedback in the Two Writing Approaches --- p.8 / Chapter 1.2.1 --- The Content of Teacher Feedback --- p.8 / Chapter 1.2.2 --- The Timing of Teacher Feedback --- p.9 / Chapter 1.2.3 --- The Purpose of Teacher Feedback --- p.10 / Chapter 1.3 --- The Importance of Students' Views of Teacher Feedback in Process Writing --- p.11 / Chapter 1.4 --- Overview of the Thesis --- p.12 / Chapter CHAPTER 2 --- LITERATURE REVIEW --- p.14 / Chapter 2.1 --- From Product to Process: A Brief Account of the Change in Teaching Approach Towards Writing --- p.14 / Chapter 2.1.1 --- Product Writing --- p.14 / Chapter 2.1.2 --- Process Writing: The Overriding Concern over Writing Process --- p.15 / Chapter 2.1.3 --- Process Writing: The Method --- p.15 / Chapter 2.2 --- Teacher Feedback on Student Writing: Definition and Rationale --- p.16 / Chapter 2.3 --- From Error Feedback to All-round Teacher Feedback --- p.19 / Chapter 2.4 --- Importance of Acknowledging Students' Views: the Claims --- p.21 / Chapter 2.4.1 --- ESL Context --- p.21 / Chapter 2.4.2 --- EFL Context --- p.22 / Chapter 2.5 --- Importance of Acknowledging Students' Views: the Behaviour --- p.25 / Chapter 2.6 --- The Hong Kong Context --- p.27 / Chapter 2.7 --- Research Gaps: Triangulation in Understanding Students' Needs --- p.30 / Chapter CHAPTER 3 --- METHODOLOGY --- p.32 / Chapter 3.1 --- Research Questions --- p.32 / Chapter 3.2 --- Research Design: The Case Study Approach --- p.33 / Chapter 3.2.1 --- Definition of Case Study --- p.33 / Chapter 3.2.2 --- Rationale of Employing Case Study --- p.34 / Chapter 3.3 --- Instrumentation and Rationale Behind --- p.36 / Chapter 3.3.1 --- Questionnaires on Student Writers --- p.37 / Chapter 3.3.2 --- Interviews --- p.37 / Chapter 3.3.2.1 --- Interviews with Student Writers --- p.38 / Chapter 3.3.2.2 --- Interviews with Writing Instructors --- p.38 / Chapter 3.3.3 --- Text Analysis on the Marked Preliminary Drafts and Final Versions of Writing --- p.39 / Chapter 3.4 --- Pilot Study --- p.39 / Chapter 3.4.1 --- Modification of Text Analysis Guide --- p.40 / Chapter 3.4.2 --- Modification of Other Instruments --- p.40 / Chapter 3.5 --- Main Study --- p.41 / Chapter 3.5.1 --- The Writing Courses --- p.41 / Chapter 3.5.1.1 --- Writing Class A --- p.43 / Chapter 3.5.1.2 --- Writing Class B --- p.44 / Chapter 3.5.1.3 --- Writing Class C --- p.44 / Chapter 3.5.2 --- Profiles of Informants --- p.45 / Chapter 3.5.2.1 --- Profiles of Teacher Informants --- p.46 / Chapter 3.5.2.2 --- Profiles of Student Informants --- p.47 / Chapter 3.5.3 --- Data Collection Process --- p.48 / Chapter 3.5.4 --- Limitations --- p.49 / Chapter 3.5.5 --- Data Analysis --- p.51 / Chapter 3.6 --- Chapter Summary --- p.51 / Chapter CHAPTER 4 --- RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS --- p.53 / Chapter 4.1 --- Teacher Feedback on Preliminary Drafts and Final Version --- p.53 / Chapter 4.1.1 --- Teacher Feedback on Preliminary Drafts --- p.54 / Chapter 4.1.1.1 --- Student Views of Teacher Feedback on Preliminary Drafts: Questionnaires and Interviews --- p.54 / Chapter 4.1.1.2 --- Text Analysis on Preliminary Drafts --- p.57 / Chapter 4.1.2 --- Teacher Feedback on Final Version --- p.59 / Chapter 4.1.2.1 --- Students' Views of Teacher Feedback on Final Version --- p.60 / Chapter 4.1.2.2 --- Text Analysis on Teacher Feedback on Final Version --- p.62 / Chapter 4.1.3 --- Teacher Feedback on Preliminary Drafts and Final Version: Teachers' Rationale --- p.65 / Chapter 4.1.3.1 --- Teacher A's Rationale on Teacher Feedback --- p.66 / Chapter 4.1.3.2 --- Teacher B's Rationale on Teacher Feedback --- p.67 / Chapter 4.1.3.3 --- Teacher C's Rationale on Teacher Feedback --- p.69 / Chapter 4.1.4 --- Teacher Feedback on Preliminary Drafts and Final Version: A Comparison --- p.71 / Chapter 4.2 --- "Students' Response to Teacher Feedback: Attended, Deleted, and Ignored" --- p.73 / Chapter 4.2.1 --- Feedback Attended to and Received Positively --- p.73 / Chapter 4.2.1.1 --- Feedback Attended to: Student Questionnaires --- p.73 / Chapter 4.2.1.2 --- Feedback Attended to: General Picture From Text Analysis --- p.77 / Chapter 4.2.1.3 --- Feedback Attended to and Its Easiness and Difficulties: Student Interviews and Questionnaires --- p.78 / Chapter 4.2.1.3.1 --- Teacher Feedback Students Found Easy to Deal With --- p.79 / Chapter 4.2.1.3.2 --- Teacher Feedback Students Found Difficult to Deal With --- p.82 / Chapter 4.2.1.3.3 --- Summary of Feedback Students Attended to --- p.88 / Chapter 4.2.1.4 --- Feedback Received Positively --- p.89 / Chapter 4.2.1.5 --- Feedback Received Positively: Critical (Negative) Feedback --- p.90 / Chapter 4.2.1.6 --- Feedback Received Positively: Minimal Use of Symbols in Feedback --- p.91 / Chapter 4.2.1.7 --- Feedback Attended to and Received Positively: Summary --- p.93 / Chapter 4.2.2 --- Feedback Partially Attended to or Deleted --- p.94 / Chapter 4.2.2.1 --- Teacher Feedback Partially Attended to: Students' Views From Questionnaires --- p.94 / Chapter 4.2.2.2 --- Teacher Feedback Partially Attended to: Student Interviews and Text Analysis --- p.95 / Chapter 4.2.2.2.1 --- “I Delete to Condense´ح --- p.95 / Chapter 4.2.2.2.2 --- “I Delete to Clarify´ح --- p.96 / Chapter 4.2.2.2.3 --- "“I Delete to Save Myself Trouble""" --- p.96 / Chapter 4.2.2.3 --- Teacher Feedback Partially Attended to: General Picture From Text Analysis --- p.97 / Chapter 4.2.2.4 --- Feedback Partially Attended to or Deleted: Summary --- p.99 / Chapter 4.2.3 --- Feedback Ignored and Received Negatively --- p.99 / Chapter 4.2.3.1 --- Feedback Ignored: Students' Views From Questionnaires --- p.100 / Chapter 4.2.3.2 --- Feedback Ignored: Students' Views From Interviews --- p.100 / Chapter 4.2.3.2.1 --- Feedback Difficult to Revise Accordingly --- p.101 / Chapter 4.2.3.2.2 --- Feedback Obscure in Letting Students Know What the Problem Was --- p.102 / Chapter 4.2.3.2.3 --- Feedback on Earlier Drafts --- p.103 / Chapter 4.2.3.2.4 --- Feedback on “Minor´ح Things --- p.104 / Chapter 4.2.3.2.5 --- Feedback Not Unique to the Essay --- p.104 / Chapter 4.2.3.2.6 --- Feedback Violating the Expression of Personal Voice --- p.105 / Chapter 4.2.3.3 --- Teacher Feedback Ignored: General Picture From Text Analysis --- p.106 / Chapter 4.2.3.4 --- Feedback Ignored: Two Extreme Cases as Illustrations --- p.108 / Chapter 4.2.3.4.1 --- Case of Jeff --- p.108 / Chapter 4.2.3.4.2 --- Case of Dorothy --- p.109 / Chapter 4.2.3.5 --- Feedback Ignored: Teachers' Views --- p.111 / Chapter 4.2.3.6 --- Feedback Received Negatively --- p.112 / Chapter 4.2.3.6.1 --- Positive Feedback --- p.112 / Chapter 4.2.3.6.2 --- Feedback Without Explanations --- p.113 / Chapter 4.2.3.7 --- Feedback Ignored and Received Negatively: Summary --- p.115 / Chapter 4.2.4 --- Students' Response to Teacher Feedback: Summary --- p.115 / Chapter 4.3 --- Reasons Behind Students' Preferences --- p.116 / Chapter 4.3.1 --- Personal Factors --- p.116 / Chapter 4.3.1.1 --- Proficiency in English --- p.116 / Chapter 4.3.1.2 --- Repertoire of Revision Strategies --- p.119 / Chapter 4.3.1.3 --- "Balancing Between Personal Voice and the ""Standard""" --- p.121 / Chapter 4.3.2 --- Interpersonal Factors --- p.124 / Chapter 4.3.2.1 --- Communication Between Teachers and Students --- p.124 / Chapter 4.3.2.2 --- Sources for Support or Advice --- p.126 / Chapter 4.3.3 --- Reasons Behind Students' Preferences: Summary --- p.129 / Chapter 4.4 --- Students' Views and Teachers' Views --- p.130 / Chapter 4.4.1 --- Students' Use of Teacher Feedback During Revision Process --- p.130 / Chapter 4.4.1.1 --- A Brief Overview of the Revision Process Undertaken by Students --- p.131 / Chapter 4.4.1.1.1 --- Revision Process Undertaken by English Majors (Class A) --- p.131 / Chapter 4.4.1.1.2 --- Revision Process Undertaken by Non-English Majors (Classes B and C) --- p.133 / Chapter 4.4.1.1.3 --- Common Feature of Revision Process Shared by the Two Groups of Students --- p.134 / Chapter 4.4.1.2 --- Strategies Used in the Revision Process --- p.135 / Chapter 4.4.1.2.1 --- Contemplating on Their Own --- p.135 / Chapter 4.4.1.2.2 --- Consulting Their Peers --- p.136 / Chapter 4.4.1.2.3 --- Consulting Their Teachers --- p.136 / Chapter 4.4.1.2.4 --- Consulting Other Resources --- p.136 / Chapter 4.4.2 --- Teachers' Expectations on the Use of Teacher feedback in Revision Process --- p.137 / Chapter 4.4.2.1 --- Summary of Teachers' Recommendations of the Revision Process --- p.137 / Chapter 4.4.2.1.1 --- Teacher A's Recommendations --- p.137 / Chapter 4.4.2.1.2 --- Teacher B's Recommendations --- p.139 / Chapter 4.4.2.1.3 --- Teacher C's Recommendations --- p.139 / Chapter 4.4.2.2 --- Strategies Recommended in the Revision Process --- p.140 / Chapter 4.4.3 --- Students' Views and Teachers' Views: A Comparison --- p.141 / Chapter CHAPTER 5 --- CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS --- p.143 / Chapter 5.1 --- Conclusions --- p.143 / Chapter 5.2 --- Significance --- p.145 / Chapter 5.3 --- Pedagogical Implications --- p.147 / Chapter 5.3.1 --- Short-term Implications --- p.147 / Chapter 5.3.1.1 --- Make Teacher Feedback More Comprehensible and Specific --- p.148 / Chapter 5.3.1.2 --- Hold Teacher-student Conferences --- p.150 / Chapter 5.3.1.3 --- Introduce Peer Review --- p.151 / Chapter 5.3.1.4 --- Teach Revision Strategies --- p.151 / Chapter 5.3.2 --- Long-term Implications --- p.152 / Chapter 5.3.2.1 --- Read More! --- p.153 / Chapter 5.3.2.2 --- Think More! --- p.154 / Chapter 5.3.2.3 --- Write More! --- p.155 / Chapter 5.4 --- Limitations --- p.156 / Chapter 5.4.1 --- Insufficient Testing of the Instruments (Pilot Study) --- p.156 / Chapter 5.4.2 --- Uneven Distribution of Student Interviewees Among the Three Writing Classes (Main Study) --- p.157 / Chapter 5.4.3 --- Inconsistent Proportion of Writing Gathered From the Three Writing Classes (Main Study) --- p.158 / Chapter 5.4.4 --- Inconsistent Timing Between the Three Writing Classes (Main Study) --- p.158 / Chapter 5.4.5 --- The Scope of Teacher Feedback on Students' Writing (Main Study) --- p.159 / Chapter 5.5 --- Recommendations for Future Studies --- p.160 / Chapter 5.5.1 --- Comprehensive Testing of Instruments With Tailored Design --- p.160 / Chapter 5.5.2 --- More Even Distribution of Student Interviewees With Different Characteristics --- p.160 / Chapter 5.5.3 --- More Consistent Number of Papers Collected From Different Writing Classes --- p.161 / Chapter 5.5.4 --- More Consistent Schedule Among Writing Classes --- p.161 / Chapter 5.5.5 --- Wider Scope of Enquiry of Teacher Feedback --- p.162 / APPENDICES / Appendix A Student Questionnaire --- p.171 / Appendix B Student Interview Guide --- p.176 / Appendix C Teacher Interview Guide --- p.177 / Appendix D Text Analysis Guide --- p.178 / Appendix E Consent Letter (to students) --- p.179 / Appendix F Consent Letter (to instructors) --- p.181 / Appendix G Response Rate and Characteristics of Student Respondents of Student Questionnaires --- p.183
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:cuhk.edu.hk/oai:cuhk-dr:cuhk_325978 |
| Date | January 2007 |
| Contributors | Lui, Nga Kwan., Chinese University of Hong Kong Graduate School. Division of English. |
| Source Sets | The Chinese University of Hong Kong |
| Language | English, Chinese |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Text, bibliography |
| Format | print, xv, 183 leaves : col. ill. ; 30 cm. |
| Coverage | China, Hong Kong, China, Hong Kong |
| Rights | Use of this resource is governed by the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons “Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International” License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) |
Page generated in 0.0032 seconds