Return to search

Laparoscopic assisted resection of recto-sigmoid carcinoma: is it justified?. / CUHK electronic theses & dissertations collection

Colorectal cancer is one of the commonest malignancies worldwide. Its prevention, diagnosis and treatments have attracted multidisciplinary attention. Surgery is the mainstay of treatment for colorectal cancer. It was estimated that up to 85% of colorectal cancer were amenable to surgical treatment, whether curative or palliative. Not surprisingly laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer was reported soon after cholecystectomy. However, with the appearance of early port site recurrence, most authorities were concerned about the adequacy of tumour clearance and the long-term survival after laparoscopic resection. / In this thesis, comparative and randomized studies were conducted to answer the above questions. It was concluded that, as compared to conventional open surgery, laparoscopic assisted resection of recto-sigmoid carcinoma was less painful and allowed earlier post-operative recovery. Tissue trauma, as reflected by systemic cytokines response, was less after laparoscopic assisted resection. Some cellular components of immune system were also less suppressed. Most importantly, laparoscopic resection did not jeopardize the survival and disease control of patients. The justification of adopting laparoscopic technique would depend on the societal value of its effectiveness in improving the short-term post-operative outcomes. / Laparoscopic technology and its application may be the biggest advancement in nearly all surgical specialties in the last decade. Since the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, enthusiastic surgeons have attempted laparoscopic approach in almost every type of operations, and many of the techniques have gained public acceptance within a very short time. However, most of these developments were not based on good scientific evidence from comparative study. While laparoscopic cholecystectomy was shown to cause less pain and allow patients to recover earlier after operation, these benefits may or may not be conferred to other procedures and diseases. / Therefore, to justify the use of laparoscopic assisted colorectal resection for carcinoma, two criteria must be satisfied. Firstly the long term survival and the disease free interval of patients should not be adversely affected, as these are the most important endpoints in the success of tumour surgery. Secondly, the proposed benefits of minimally invasive surgery must be demonstrated, otherwise it is not worthwhile to adopt a new technique. / Leung Ka Lau. / "July 2005." / Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 67-01, Section: B, page: 0174. / Thesis (M.D.)--Chinese University of Hong Kong, 2005. / Includes bibliographical references (p. 122-155). / Electronic reproduction. Hong Kong : Chinese University of Hong Kong, [2012] System requirements: Adobe Acrobat Reader. Available via World Wide Web. / Electronic reproduction. [Ann Arbor, MI] : ProQuest Information and Learning, [200-] System requirements: Adobe Acrobat Reader. Available via World Wide Web. / School code: 1307.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:cuhk.edu.hk/oai:cuhk-dr:cuhk_343634
Date January 2005
ContributorsLeung, Ka Lau., Chinese University of Hong Kong Graduate School. Division of Medicine.
Source SetsThe Chinese University of Hong Kong
LanguageEnglish
Detected LanguageEnglish
TypeText, theses
Formatelectronic resource, microform, microfiche, 1 online resource (157 p. : ill.)
RightsUse of this resource is governed by the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons “Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International” License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Page generated in 0.0024 seconds