Return to search

The rhetorical democracy of the preface: Literary professionalism, popular authority, and nineteenth-century American readers

This study examines the rhetorical creations of "democratic," literary readers in nineteenth-century book prefaces by Catharine Sedgwick, James Fenimore Cooper, Nathaniel Hawthorne, Louisa May Alcott, Harriet Beecher Stowe and Frederick Douglass. Though diverse, these writers shared a cultural need to envision a serious, literary reader who embodied, nonetheless, the ideals of popular sanction, democratic politics and marketplace culture. Through appeals to the extrapolitical authorities of nationalism, Common Sense, self-culture, domesticity, social reform and commercial popularity, these writers used the partly fictive, partly social discourse of the preface to bridge a gap between their emergent, sense of literary professionalism and the American myth of popular authority--a cultural divide that, in the twentieth century, would be institutionalized in the separation of middlebrow and highbrow cultures. / While many of these nineteenth-century writers and books were commercial and artistic successes in their days, they ultimately failed to establish, once and for all, a viable, unitary tradition of popular, literary reading in the United States. These prefaces still demand the attention of American writers, scholars and teachers, however, for the very reason that these rhetorical tactics more comprehensively define, in their diverse failures, the ongoing cultural challenges of authorizing oneself in a democratic society than they might in some mythic, all-unifying narrative of success. / Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 55-09, Section: A, page: 2835. / Major Professor: Jerome Stern. / Thesis (Ph.D.)--The Florida State University, 1994.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:fsu.edu/oai:fsu.digital.flvc.org:fsu_77262
ContributorsStroupe, Harry Craig., Florida State University
Source SetsFlorida State University
LanguageEnglish
Detected LanguageEnglish
TypeText
Format492 p.
RightsOn campus use only.
RelationDissertation Abstracts International

Page generated in 0.0026 seconds