Return to search

A comparison of two methods of bootstrapping in a reliability model

We consider bootstrapping in the following reliability model which was considered by Doss, Freitag, and Proschan (1987). Available for testing is a sample of iid systems each having the same structure of m independent components. Each system is continuously observed until it fails. For every component in each system, either a failure time or a censoring time is recorded. A failure time is recorded if the component fails before or at the time of system failure; otherwise a censoring time is recorded. To estimate the distribution of the component lifelengths F$\sb1,\...$,F$\sb{\rm m}$, one can formally compute the Kaplan-Meier estimates F$\sb1,\...$,F$\sb{\rm m}$. Various quantities of interest, such as the probability that a new system will survive time t$\sb0$, may then be estimated by combining F$\sb1,\...$,F$\sb{\rm m}$ in a suitable way. In this model, bootstrapping can be carried out in two different ways. One can resample n systems at random from the original n systems. Alternatively, one can construct artificial systems by generating independent random lifelengths from the Kaplan-Meier estimates F$\sb{\rm j}$, and from those form artificial data. The two methods are distinct. We show that asymptotically, bootstrapping by either method yields correct answers. We also compare the two methods via simulation studies. / Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 49-12, Section: B, page: 5385. / Major Professor: Hani Doss. / Thesis (Ph.D.)--The Florida State University, 1988.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:fsu.edu/oai:fsu.digital.flvc.org:fsu_77918
ContributorsChiang, Yuang-Chin., Florida State University
Source SetsFlorida State University
LanguageEnglish
Detected LanguageEnglish
TypeText
Format56 p.
RightsOn campus use only.
RelationDissertation Abstracts International

Page generated in 0.0029 seconds