Return to search

Modes of Conflict Resolution and Stable Outcomes

<p> An important issue in the study of conflict behavior concerns the
manner in which one party involved in a conflict situation, can influence
his protagonist to resolve the conflict in a way Which is mutually rewarding
(i.e. cooperative). The present thesis is addressed to this issue.
In order to study the relationship between preasymptotic interaction
patterns and stable states of cooperation and conflict, the data from a.
variety of two-person, mixed motive games are organized such that:
a} criteria are established for defining stable states of cooperation
and conflict; b) preasymptotic interaction patterns are clearly distinguished
from these stable, asymptotic states; and c) the role of each
dyad member is considered separately. </p> <p> Organizing the data in the manner outlined above allows the description of strategies used by real subjects Which lead to high levels
or cooperation and conflict. Dyads who attain a high level or cooperation
are found to use a cautious trust strategy. This strategy consists of
two components, a cooperative signalling component and a firmness component.
The cooperative signalling component is operationalized in
terms of the difference in the proportion or cooperative choices between
one dyad member and the other. The firmness component is operationalized
in terms of the level of retaliation against an uncooperative action
(D reciprocity). Dyads who attain a high level or conflict. are
characterlzed by an inappropriate signalling compcinent, and/or the absence
of a firmness component. Data are presented which indicate how the requirements for a successful cooperative signalling component vary as a function of other variables. </p> <p> The implications of focusing on stable outcomes in a conflict situation, and organizing the data in the manner developed here, are discussed in terms of notions current in the psychological literature
on conflict behavior. Data from the present thesis are used to argue
that strategic variables are relatively more important factors in
determining stable outcomes in a particular conflict situation, than
either predispositional or personality factors. </p> / Thesis / Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:mcmaster.ca/oai:macsphere.mcmaster.ca:11375/20995
Date05 1900
CreatorsSanta-Barbara, John
ContributorsSwingle, P. G., Psychology
Source SetsMcMaster University
LanguageEnglish
Detected LanguageEnglish

Page generated in 0.002 seconds