Return to search

A critical analysis of the effectiveness of public participation in planning in democratic South Africa / Tjaart Andries Goosen

Humanist thinking on development embraces a people-centred view in which people are
considered active agents for change in society. However, the nature and success of public
participation in development is a contentious and widely debated issue in international planning
and development literature. Simultaneously, realities in planning practice such as the
effectiveness and influence of public participation on decision making seems to be daunting.
In South Africa public participation is a constitutional right and enforced by planning legislation.
Although post-apartheid South African legislation devised strategies to increase the participation
of the public on all spheres of government, the nature of participation seems to be contradictive
and regarded by numerous authors to be ad hoc, incremental, unstructured, unbalanced and
uncoordinated. While good intentions were laid by the Constitution and development legislation
and policies, these documents do not necessarily ensure effectiveness of participation, nor create
a culture of participation. The aims of the research were thus twofold: firstly, to determine the
outcome of public participation in planning applications and secondly, to evaluate the
effectiveness of public participation against the background of the current legislative framework
in order to enable a greater inclusion of participation in planning.
The research followed a quantitative approach and included an in-depth study of statutory town
planning applications in Tlokwe Local Municipality completed over a period of sixteen years. The
inclusion of both periods before and after democratisation in South Africa shed some light on
whether the effectiveness of public participation increased or declined during this period. A
database was compiled on the detail of applications and included the type of application, location,
legislation involved, public participation involved, objections (if any), rebuttals on objections and
the outcome of the application. To organise and summarize the raw data gathered, a descriptive
statistical analysis was undertaken.
Although participation of the public is needed in town planning applications and enforced by
legislation in South Africa, the public’s view that their contribution through objections is not
effective was negated by the research. For example, objections (as one indication of the
effectiveness of public participation) did not feature prominently (only 6, 3% of applications had
objections), but these showed efficacy to influence the outcome of the applications. Overall this
research provided a first step towards a better understanding of the effectiveness of public
participation towards improved and more inclusive decision making. / MArt et Scien (Urban and Regional planning), North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2015

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:netd.ac.za/oai:union.ndltd.org:nwu/oai:dspace.nwu.ac.za:10394/15247
Date January 2015
CreatorsGoosen, Tjaart Andries
Source SetsSouth African National ETD Portal
LanguageEnglish
Detected LanguageEnglish
TypeThesis

Page generated in 0.0018 seconds