The majority of South African learners attend public schools, all of which are encouraged to
supplement government funding with private funds - namely through fees charged of
learners' parents. A review of the literature suggests that school fees can impede the right to
education and the achievement of other national development goals by restricting access for
poor learners, or by diminishing the quality of education. While the issue of school fees has
been hotly debated in South Africa, there is little information about what is actually
happening in schools. This research, conducted in a peri-urban area outside of Durban,
KwaZulu-Natal, is designed to explore the perspectives and experiences of principals with
regards to the school fee policy. Eleven principals were interviewed: nine from relatively
poor schools and two from a wealthier area, and their experiences with regards to the
implementation of the school fee policy were compared and analysed.
The findings suggest the implementation of the policy tends to be similar across schools of
similar financial standing, but that there are considerable differences between the experiences
of principals from poor and wealthy schools. The wealthier schools implemented the policy
'to-the-letter' and had hired staff and created systems to ensure all rules were properly
followed. All of the poorer schools found parts of the policy impossible to implement in
their schools and had adapted the policy in similar ways to better fit their situation. For
example, amongst other adaptations, they allowed parents to apply for an exemption by
simply discussing their circumstances with the principal, or obtaining an affidavit from the
police, instead of making everyone fill out an official application form.
Part of the problem is that the policy is based on assumptions which are not consistent with
the reality of the South African context in that there are many different 'realities' faced by
schools, yet there is only one rigid policy. Many schools find parts of the policy's processes
to be impractical or irrelevant at best, and actually decreasing the quality of education they
are able to provide at worst. Areas within which policy assumptions and reality did not
match include: the implications of the distribution of income in South Africa on school
financing; the power and access to information of parents and SGBs, and the ability or desire
of parents to pay fees and/or be involved in the oversight of their children's education; and,
the ability of provincial Departments of Education to properly support poor and/or Nonsection
21 schools. Additionally, Non-section 21 schools were found to be at an economic
disadvantage compared with Section 21 schools.
Another issue is that there are currently adverse incentives built into the policy. Amongst
other effects these incentives encourage principals to minimise the number of exemptions
approved, and for parents to either not pay at all, or to provide information to principals that
underestimates their annual income.
The significant contrasts in experiences between experiences of poor and wealthy schools
and the adverse incentives built into the policy suggest the right question to ask may not be
whether or not schools are implementing the policy correctly, but whether the policy is
correctly designed to achieve the goals of the South African education system within the
current context. / Thesis (M.A.)-University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, 2008.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:netd.ac.za/oai:union.ndltd.org:ukzn/oai:http://researchspace.ukzn.ac.za:10413/1109 |
| Date | January 2008 |
| Creators | Raab, Erin. |
| Contributors | Lund, Frances. |
| Source Sets | South African National ETD Portal |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Thesis |
Page generated in 0.0024 seconds