This study was an exploratory thematic and categorical analysis of the titles and abstracts of
women and men psychology master's dissertations completed from 1964 to 1998. These
dissertations represent research undertaken at all South African universities. They are located on
the Nexus database, developed by the Centre for Science Development (CSD) at the Human
Science Research Council (HSRC) and maintained by the National Research Foundation (NRF).
This research is an investigation of trends, which might lead to conclusions regarding the areas of
psychological specialisations chosen for research, the methodologies of research applied and the
sample type employed in the research. Secondly, a longitudinal analysis was conducted to
examine if any shifts of focus over time in any of the three areas already mentioned (i.e.
specialisation, methodology and sample type) had occurred.
The methodology used was a combination of both quantitative statistical analysis and qualitative
analysis of selected women's and men's dissertations. Content analysis was the preliminary
research method used to code the data which was then statistically analysed by means of
correspondence analysis. The literature review examined psychology's historical exclusion of
women both as professionals and as potential subjects of research. The literature also examines
the founding premise of psychological research dominated by scientific empiricism underpinned
by logical positivism. Feminist literature was then reviewed in order to offer a commentary on
the patriarchal underpinnings embedded in the discipline and to offer and explore alternatives.
The outcome of this study revealed a number of valuable findings. First, there had been a major
increase in the selection of women masters' students in psychology. Second, the dominant
methodology remains quantitative in nature. There is however a slight increase in qualitative and
combined research by both women and men in the 1990s. Third, there has been a radical increase
in the 1990s of women entering the male domain of industrial psychology. Fourth, no major
differences were found between women and men masters' students and their choice of
specialisation area, methodology and sample type selected. Finally, women more often than men
recognised the gender and ethnicity of their sample subjects. It must however be noted that
gender and ethnicity of the sample subjects were still relatively infrequently registered in the
titles and abstracts of both women and men's masters' dissertations.
In conclusion the plethora of data available on Nexus and the findings identified in the present
study a window has opened up to the potential for many future projects in terms of South African
psychology masters' research.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:netd.ac.za/oai:union.ndltd.org:ukzn/oai:http://researchspace.ukzn.ac.za:10413/7966 |
| Date | January 2002 |
| Creators | Foster, Lynn. |
| Contributors | Richter, Linda., Solomon, Vernon. |
| Source Sets | South African National ETD Portal |
| Language | en_ZA |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Thesis |
Page generated in 0.0109 seconds