This document is aimed at all parties involved with conservation, planning and
management of rivers within the Greater Durban Metropolitan Area, South Africa.
The intentions of this study were to provide information on the health of the rivers
using freshwater invertebrates and to identify areas where investigative efforts should
be focused. In doing so, this document incorporates two data processing methods or
techniques used in biomonitoring, the South African Scoring System (SASS) Rapid
Bioassessment Technique (RBA) version 4 and the Integrated Habitat Assessment
System (IHAS version 2c). The history, current status and future prospects and
potential benefits of biological indicators both globally and in South Africa are
reviewed and discussed. The RBA (SASS4) involved the standardised collection of
samples using the "kick and sweep" technique from defined habitat types at
representative sites on river stretches using a standardised net following defined
methods. The total score per site is calculated for each family represented in the
sample, which is then summed to give the SASS4 score. Lower scores are given to
families with a high level of tolerance for polluted waters. The Average Score Per
Taxon (ASPT) computation is obtained by dividing the SASS4 total by the number of
taxa (families) in the sample. Both scores were considered when determining water
quality impairment. The number and abundance of the different taxa and the number
of biotopes present were considered as other measures of the river condition. The
presence of numerous families of highly tolerant organisms (sludge worms and
leeches) usually indicated poor water quality as represented in the Umlaas River,
iSiphingo River, Tongati River, and the Ohlanga River. Several different types (or
taxa) of stoneflies, mayflies and caddisflies (higher biodiversity) indicated a healthy
site for example the iLovu River. Moderate river sites were characterized by
declination in invertebrate diversity. Invertebrate diversity declines as the
degradation of water quality increases. The manner in which SASS4 scores varied
with "degree of anthropogenic impact" showed that the assessment does yield results,
which follow water quality changes, provided that when SASS4 scores are less than
50, little attention is given to ASPT. At intermediate and high impacted sites ASPT
did not follow habitat quality. However at low impacted water quality sites both
SASS and ASPT tended to be greatest where habitat quality was the best. This study
has identified that water quality "appears" to have a greater effect on macro
invertebrate communities than the physical habitat and SASS distinguished sites with
differing levels of water quality. This method was not designed to enable the exact
nature of the disturbance to be determined, and it was intended that once an
impairment of water quality had been established, it would be further assessed via
intensive chemical and other studies. The use of more ecological indicators for
example the inclusion of IHAS (version 2c) allowed a more comprehensive
assessment of river health and more confidence could be linked to the outcome. / Thesis (M.Sc.Eng.)-University of Durban-Westville, 2002.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:netd.ac.za/oai:union.ndltd.org:ukzn/oai:http://researchspace.ukzn.ac.za:10413/8933 |
| Date | January 2002 |
| Creators | Nunkumar, Shamilla. |
| Contributors | Dickens, C. W. S., Olorunsogo, F. |
| Source Sets | South African National ETD Portal |
| Language | en_ZA |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Thesis |
Page generated in 0.0021 seconds