Return to search

Early determination of the reproductive potential of beef heifers using reproductive tract scoring, pelvimetry and transrectal ultrasonography

A series of 4 observational studies was performed on a Bovelder herd at Johannesburg
Water’s Northern Farm. The heifer and cow breeding seasons started on 15 October and
1 November every year, and consisted of 50 d and 60 d of oestrus observation respectively,
with once daily artificial insemination (AI). Five to 7 days after the AI period bulls were
added in multi-sire groups for a period of 42 d. Pregnancy diagnoses were performed
between 23 March and 26 April every year. The farming system had been in place for >25
years, with few deviations.
In the first study, reproductive tract scoring (RTS) by transrectal palpation on a 5-
point scale was performed 1 day before the start of breeding on a group of heifers (n = 272)
born in 2002. Heifers with RTS 1 or 2 were estimated to be pre-pubertal, those with RTS 3
pubertal and those with RTS 4 or 5 post-pubertal. Pre-breeding body weight (BW) and body
condition score (BCS) were recorded, and Kleiber ratio (KR) was calculated (average daily
gain/end weight0.75). Heifers were followed until they weaned their first calves. The
objectives of this study were to determine if RTS is a valid tool to predict reproduction and
production performance in limited bred beef heifers, and to compare its predictive value with
that of BW, BCS, age and KR. After adjustment for BW and age, RTS was positively
associated with pregnancy rate to the 50 day AI season (P < 0.01), calf weaning weight (P <
0.01) and pregnancy rate to the subsequent breeding season (P < 0.01), and negatively
associated with days to calving (P < 0.01). RTS was a better predictor of fertility than was
vi
KR, and similar in its prediction of calf weaning weight. It was concluded that RTS is a
predictor of heifer fertility and compares well with other traits used as a predictor of
production outcomes.
It was further hypothesised that RTS may predict long-term reproductive
performance due to its association with pregnancy outcome and days to calving after first
breeding, combined with reports that heifers calving early tend to calve early in subsequent
seasons and have increased lifetime production. In study 2, a 7-year longitudinal study, 292
beef cows in two age cohorts were observed from 1-2 d before their first breeding season
(day of RTS), until they had weaned up to 5 calves. Years to reproductive failure was defined
as the number of years until a cow failed to become pregnant during the AI season. Animals
with RTS 1 or 2 were at increased risk of early reproductive failure compared to those with
RTS 4 or 5 (HR = 1.4, 95% CI 1.0, 1.9) despite the fact that RTS was not associated with
calving rate or days to calving after the second calving season. The predictive value of RTS
was lower in the age cohort with a higher prevalence of anoestrus. Most animals with RTS 1
or 2 that were subsequently detected in oestrus were in early to mid di-oestrus at the time of
scoring. It was concluded that RTS is a valid culling tool to improve long-term reproductive
success in a seasonal breeding system, by excluding poor performing animals. It was further
concluded that the predictive value of RTS decreases with increasing prevalence of anoestrus
and at certain stages of the oestrous cycle.
Apart from failure to calve, dystocia as a result of foeto-maternal disproportion is the
cause of significant production loss in beef heifers. Internal pelvis area (PA) can be
calculated as the product of vertical and horizontal diameter of the pelvis measured
transrectally using a calliper device. In study 3, the effects of five culling strategies using prebreeding
PA data on calving and dystocia rates and on pre-breeding and calf birth weight
(BWT) were compared in 484 heifers. Multiple regression analyses were used to determine
independent predictors of PA, calf BWT and dystocia. Hypothetical culling of 10 or 20% of
heifers was applied within age cohort after ranking by each of the following: unadjusted PA
(PA); PA adjusted to 365 d of age (APA); PA:BW ratio (PA:BW); PA adjusted to the median
BW of the group by the regression coefficient of PA on BW(BWPA) and PA similarly
adjusted to the median lean BW (LBWPA). Dam parity, calf BWT and either BWPA or
LBWPA were the only independent predictors of dystocia (P < 0.05), whereas the effect of
PA tended to be significant only after adjusting for calf BWT (P = 0.08). After culling by PA
or APA, retained heifers were heavier, had a higher calving rate and calves tended to be
heavier at birth compared to culled heifers, but dystocia rates were not different. Although culling by PA:BW resulted in lower dystocia rate, it resulted in lower pre-breeding BW in
retained than in culled heifers. Culling by BWPA and LBWPA had better sensitivity and
specificity for dystocia than PA, and resulted in higher calving- and lower dystocia rates in
the retained heifers, without affecting the pre-breeding BW or calf BWT. It was concluded
that pelvimetry is a useful culling tool to aid in the management of dystocia in yearling
heifers, and that adjustment of PA to median BW within age group improves its accuracy and
avoids the undesirable side-effects of using unadjusted PA.
The strong association of PA with calving rate resulted in the hypothesis for study 4,
namely that PA can add prognostic value to RTS as a predictor of reproductive failure in beef
heifers. Transrectal ultrasound (US) examination of the reproductive tract was also
investigated in this study (n = 488) with the objective of identifying which ultrasonographic
measures taken at a single point in time before the onset of breeding were independently
associated with reproductive outcomes. In this study pregnancy failure was defined as the
failure to become pregnant after the AI and bull breeding periods while anoestrus was defined
as the failure to be detected in oestrus during the entire 50 d AI period. BCS, uterus horn
diameter, absence of a CL, largest follicle of less than 13mm and PA were the pre-breeding
examination variables that remained in prognostic models (P < 0.1). Combining either the
model based on the three remaining US measures or RTS with PA provided more accurate
prognostic models for pregnancy failure and anoestrus than using RTS alone (P < 0.05). It
was concluded that US measures have prognostic value for pregnancy failure in restricted
bred yearling heifers as a result of their association with anoestrus, and that smaller PA has
additional value to identify poor performing heifers.
In conclusion, pre-breeding examination is useful to identify beef cows with lower
potential to reproduce successfully over the long term in a restricted breeding system. It is
recommended that PA should always be included in such examination, either unadjusted or
adjusted by BW, in herds with a low and high incidence of dystocia respectively, in
combination with ultrasonography of the reproductive tract. When ultrasonography is not
available, the accuracy of RTS by transrectal palpation can likely be improved by repeating it
in low scoring animals after 7 days. / Thesis (PhD)--University of Pretoria, 2013. / gm2014 / Production Animal Studies / unrestricted

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:netd.ac.za/oai:union.ndltd.org:up/oai:repository.up.ac.za:2263/40281
Date January 2013
CreatorsHolm, D.E. (Dietmar Erik)
ContributorsThompson, P.N. (Peter N.), dietmar.holm@up.ac.za, Nielen, Mirjam, Irons, Pete Charles
PublisherUniversity of Pretoria
Source SetsSouth African National ETD Portal
LanguageEnglish
Detected LanguageEnglish
TypeThesis
Rights© 2013 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria.

Page generated in 0.0026 seconds