Return to search

Pre-hospital trauma care: training and preparedness of, and practices by, medical general practitioners in Limpopo Province.

M.Fam.Med., Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, 2009 / Trauma is a pandemic that has a significant negative impact on the lives of its victims and national economies. This descriptive study was conducted on 103 private medical general practitioners in Limpopo Province. Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the University of the Witwatersrand Committee for research on Human Subjects (Medical). Approval protocol number M050230.
The aim of the study was to determine the state of pre-hospital trauma care: training and preparedness of and practice by private medical general practitioners (GPs) in Limpopo Province. Data was collected by means of an anonymous, confidential, self-administered questionnaire.
The objectives were to determine demographic features of the respondents; determine the status of emergency pre-hospital trauma training, preparedness and practice amongst the respondents; and to determine their incentives and disincentives to trauma medicine training, preparedness and practice in Limpopo province.
The response rate was 36%. Fifty five per cent (55%) of the respondents had received trauma training since they commenced work as GPs. The proportion of GPs who said that they received trauma training while working in hospitals casualty departments was 52%. The number of respondents who completed ATLS was 24 (23%). Five (21%) of those who had completed ATLS updated their qualifications during years 2001 to 2005. Of the GPs surveyed 46% were not aware of ATLS course offered by the College of Emergency Care at Polokwane City.
The majority of the respondents graduated as medical practitioners from the university of Pretoria (38%) and MEDUNSA (31%). But undergoing trauma management training was not associated with the medical schools from which
4
respondents graduated as medical practitioners (p=0.767; Fisher’s exact=0.827; Pearson chi2 = 4.9075). The medical schools from which respondents graduated as medical practitioners was also not related to the amount of private medical practice that comprised emergency care (p= 0.372).
Undergoing trauma training was not associated with the age of a GP (p value= 0.120; Fisher exact=0.127). Sex was not found to be associated with trauma training (p=0.895; Fisher exact=1.000). Sex also had no link to the proportion of medical practice comprising emergency care (p-value=0.153; Fisher ‘s exact=0.214; Pearson Chi2). Even though location of GP’s practice was reported to be both an incentive and disincentive to trauma management training it was found not to be associated with trauma management training (p=0.393; Fisher exact=0.426; Pearson chi2 =1.5687)
There was no association between location of GP’s practice and preparedness for trauma management. The exception to the finding was in terms of availability of chest drains where the p-value was 0.001. It was found that 31% of respondents who indicated that they had chest drains were based in rural areas while about 6% were practicing in urban areas. Availability of morphine and other analgesics (p-value=0.025, Fisher’s exact=0.038, Pearson Chi2 (1)=5.0165) were associated with preparedness for trauma.
There was no association between type of GP practice and trauma management training (Pearson Chi2 (2) =2.1242. p- value = 0.346. Fisher’s exact = 0.429). Almost 95% of those who stated that they spent at least 50% of their time in private general medical practice were full-time. Being in full-time private general medical practice did not necessarily translate into a higher proportion of the practice that comprised trauma care. It was found that 64% of the respondents who were in full-time private general medical practice had an emergency trauma care burden of less than 10% compared to 36% that had a proportion of 10% and more. Amongst part-time practitioners the percentage of those whose burden of trauma care was less than 10% was equal to that of those with 10% and more. The findings implied lack of an association between time spent in private general medical practice and proportion of the practice that constitutes trauma care (p=0.621).
The commonest method of updating trauma management skills was through personal study (37% of respondents) followed by attendance of trauma meetings (24% of respondents). Trauma trained GPs tended to have a higher proportion of their practices that comprised emergency trauma care (p-value = 0.030; Fisher’s exact =0.050) than those who had not. The frequently used sources of trauma management information were personal experience (58%) of the respondents followed by continuing medical education (50% of respondents). Almost 50.8% of the respondents reported that they were fairly skilled to manage in a pre-hospital setting various types of injuries. Minor soft tissue injuries were the type of trauma that 68% of the respondents said that they could manage excellently.
Incentives factors to both trauma training and practice were high trauma prevalence (33.3% of respondents-training: and 20.7% of respondents-practice); performance improvement (20% of respondents-training: 12.1% of respondents respectively-practice); adequate and managed trauma care facilities (17% of respondents-training: 10.4% of respondents-practice); trauma care support (6.7% of respondents-training: 6.9% of respondents-practice); the need to improve trauma knowledge and skills (17% of respondents-training: 17.2% of respondents-practice) and; strategic GP practice location (7% of respondents-training: 6.9% of respondents-practice).
Major disincentives to both trauma training and practice were lack of time for trauma care (28.9% respondents-training: 14.9% respondents practice); unsupportive staff (10% respondents-training: 14.9% respondents-practice); perceived high cost of trauma care and poor rewards (15.6% respondents-training: 11.7% respondents-practice); substandard and inaccessible trauma care facilities (15.6% respondents-training: 24.5% respondents-practice); under-utilized trauma knowledge and skills (6.7% respondents-training: 4.3% respondents-practice);
6
restrictive healthcare regulations and policies (2.2% respondents-training: 2% respondents-practice); and low number of trauma patients seen (11.1% respondents-training: 3.2% respondents-practice).
In terms of preparedness for trauma the respondents were ill-prepared for trauma as evidenced by insufficient trauma equipment and drugs. Whereas almost all the respondents (frequency 102 or 99%) had stethoscopes only 7% had cricothyrotomy set. Only 18% of them had needle with one-way valve and chest drains. The trauma drug that appeared to have been the most widely stocked was adrenaline with a frequency of 96 or 93%. It was followed by aspirin with a frequency of 95 or 92%. Ketamine and zidovudine were drugs that were least stocked by the respondents. Their frequencies were 27 or 26%) and 33 or 32% respectively. The other equipment that was infrequently available at GPs’ rooms was goggles (frequency 46%) suggesting poor adherence to safety measures.
There were low levels of preparedness to manage trauma patients independently with 43% reporting that they could independently adhere to universal safety measures. Whereas 52% of the respondents stated that they had received training in CPR 54.5% stated that they were equipped and prepared to open and protect the airway; 43% could independently provide adequate breathing while 45% of them could restore and maintain sufficient circulation, indicating a need to improve levels of CPR training.
It was recommended that more general practitioners in Limpopo province should be trained and involved in trauma care. It was further recommended that awareness should be raised about the ATLS offered at the College of Emergency Care in Polokwane City. Further research is needed to explore how trauma trained GPs could be better equipped, prepared and supported in the management of trauma. There was also a need to address the disincentive factors to trauma training, preparedness and practice while strengthening the incentives. Given the critical shortage of advanced emergency practitioners (such as paramedics) in Limpopo province, there was perhaps a need to consider how GPs, with their 7
advanced medical qualifications and strategic positioning within communities, could be better deployed in pre-hospital trauma care.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:netd.ac.za/oai:union.ndltd.org:wits/oai:wiredspace.wits.ac.za:10539/7287
Date17 September 2009
CreatorsRisiva, Obby
Source SetsSouth African National ETD Portal
LanguageEnglish
Detected LanguageEnglish
TypeThesis
Formatapplication/pdf

Page generated in 0.0031 seconds