MSc (Med), Bioethics and Health Law, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand / Purpose
There is limited literature available in South Africa concerning the interaction of
doctors with the pharmaceutical industry. The purpose of this research report
was to establish what South African doctors believe to be acceptable and
appropriate incentives from the industry, highlight what they consider reasonable
compensation for professional activities performed on behalf of the industry; and
whether they perceive interaction with the industry’s marketing apparatus to be a
significant influence on their prescribing habits.
Methods
A questionnaire was emailed to all active doctors in South Africa with email
addresses from the Medpages® database. The survey was conducted in March
2009 - April 2009. The desired sample size was 500 General Practitioners (GPs)
and Specialists in private practice.
Results
A final sample of 400 valid responses was analysed, representing 80% of desired
sample. Majority of the respondents were male (74%) with an almost equal split
between GPs (51.5%) and specialists (48.5%). The study revealed that 92% of
the respondents accepted branding items whilst 60% of the respondents
accepted personal gifts from the industry. The results revealed that 85% of the
respondents felt that doctors should be paid for speaking at CMEs, and just over
v
half the sample (52%) felt they wanted to be paid their own rate as opposed to
the industry rate. The investigation revealed that 77% of the respondents felt
that their interaction with the industry influenced their prescribing habits and
suggesting that such influence to be more pervasive with their colleagues,
specifically 95% felt their colleagues are influenced by their interaction with
industry (p< 0.001). About three quarters of the respondents (73%) believe
patient management may be compromised if doctors’ prescribing habits are
influenced by their interaction with the industry. Most respondents (72.5%) were
either not aware or did not know of any regulations or guidelines with regards to
acceptance of gifts by doctors from the industry.
Conclusion
This study demonstrated that perverse incentives continued to be given to
doctors, and doctors have not shown a distinct aversion to accepting these
perverse incentives and gifts. These perverse interactions have been shown in
existing literature and in this research report to influence prescribing habits.
Doctors do not seem to operate within their guidelines and legal framework, as
stipulated by the HPCSA, when accepting these potentially harmful perquisites.
What legal and ethical considerations are the doctors employing when accepting
‘incentives’ from industry is the question; and what is the doctor’s role in
protecting his/her patients? Ignorance of the guidelines, as the study indicates to
be the case, does not justify involvement in perverse relationships. Doctors have
professional and personal moral responsibilities to ensure they familiarise
vi
themselves with guidelines regulating their professional conduct and ultimately
protect the patients.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:netd.ac.za/oai:union.ndltd.org:wits/oai:wiredspace.wits.ac.za:10539/7976 |
| Date | 14 April 2010 |
| Creators | Maholwana, Mandisa Joyce Gwendoline |
| Source Sets | South African National ETD Portal |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Thesis |
| Format | application/pdf |
Page generated in 0.011 seconds