Personal experiences of almost 17 years as an academic in engineering education in South Africa indicate that with the current teaching methods which are in use, course outcomes as required by the South African Qualification Authority (SAQA) are not achieved in learning Thermodynamics 2 (MTHE 2). The purpose of this research was to investigate alternative methods of teaching and learning MTHE 2 which would assist to improve the students’ academic performance. The population for this research was students registered for National Diploma Mechanical Engineering and the accessible population was 40 students registered for MTHE 2 from Walter Sisulu University, Chiselhurst campus. Out of these 40 students, 20 voluntarily agreed to be the sample. The theoretical framework for this study was social constructivism. Social constructivism states that learning is an active process and the process of knowledge construction occurs in a socio-cultural context where the student and environment actively interact. The student involves himself/herself and does neither remain nor be allowed to remain just as a passive observer. This was an action research where students were exposed to Guided Enquiry Based Learning (GEBL) in groups. From a social constructivists approach to learning, GEBL was used to engage students in social groups during the teaching-learning process with specific focus on selected academic discipline. All ethical considerations applicable to a study of the present nature were adhered to and in addition, signed informed consent forms were obtained from participants prior to the study. Students were given an introduction to the concepts and principles as per the pre-set syllabus for MTHE 2 and this was followed by problem solving sessions in which they were divided into four groups of five students each. The students were given a guided enquiry- and work-based example with an additional list of questions on each module of the syllabus. They had to select the most relevant questions from the list to analyse and develop a solution for each problem. The lecturers’ role was that of a facilitator who assisted each group with problems which the group encountered. This approach engaged students more actively in the learning process and placed more responsibility on them for their own progress in learning. This process also created an atmosphere for interaction with peers and assisted them to develop interpersonal and group communication skills. Key performance indicators were developed to measure the extent to which these outcomes were achieved. The researcher made use of an instrument structured in terms of Likert-type scale in order to objectively assess the extent of achievement. Data collected from the pilot study done in 2009 indicated that GEBL improved the students’ understanding of course content and problem analysis. Quantitative data were collected by means of standard assessment i.e. semester tests, an oral test, final examination and a KPI instrument. The KPIs were formulated to measure the extent to which the outcomes for MTHE 2 had been achieved. Qualitative data were collected through 30-minute interviews, using an open-ended interview schedule, with each member of the sample. The interviews were done by a person who qualified both as an ‘insider and outsider’ in order to minimize the risk of bias and to maintain rigour in the research. In order to qualify as an ‘insider and outsider’, one ought to be as an insider: (a) from the same ethnic group, (b) qualified in Mechanical Engineering with Thermodynamics as a major course, (c) had no power disposition e.g. a former student or a laboratory assistant (excluding staff members within the mechanical engineering department) and as an outsider, one who was not part of the GEBL process. The quantitative scores from the assessments were analysed with Predictive Analysis Software (PASW) to determine the extent to which interventions had assisted student performance. The qualitative data from the interviews were analysed with N-Vivo to reveal the impact of GEBL on student learning and understanding of MTHE 2. The results indicated that with GEBL, the students’ overall scores improved from the first assessment score of 46% written on half of the first module to the final assessment score of 55% written on all seven modules. Students could handle larger volumes of work and still obtain a higher percentage. GEBL assisted students’ in recalling factual MTHE 2 concepts, understanding of MTHE 2 concepts, principles and applications. GEBL also enhanced students’ ability to communicate procedures and processes related to MTHE 2. KPIs formulated to measure the extent to which the outcomes were met in terms of student achievement indicated a 57% achievement thereof. The KPIs developed gave a percentage achievement of the specified outcomes for MTHE 2 with GEBL. Theses KPIs can be used in future to measure the effectiveness of different teaching and learning methods in terms of achieving the outcomes. It is therefore recommended that GEBL be introduced into other engineering courses also to assist students in understanding course content and in achieving the course outcomes.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:netd.ac.za/oai:union.ndltd.org:wsu/vital:18474 |
| Date | January 2012 |
| Creators | Louw, Christoffel |
| Publisher | Walter Sisulu University, Faculty of Education |
| Source Sets | South African National ETD Portal |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Thesis, Doctoral, D Ed |
| Format | xxiii, 446 leaves, pdf |
| Rights | Walter Sisulu University |
Page generated in 0.0014 seconds