Termination of office of the member in a governing body of a limited company (Vacation of Company's Directors) This paper examines the process of resignation of members of the organs of a company. It considers both protection of the member and the company. In the first part it analyzes several issues concerning the interpretation of section 66 of the Commercial Code on the basis of judicial decisions. It focuses on the following issues: the purpose of statutory provisions; ways to notify the resignation; on which day the resignation should have been discussed; who is obliged to summon the meeting and what consequences follow the breach of this duty. The Supreme Court has ruled that the protection of a company and its director is equally important. Resignation can be notified either at the meeting or delivered to the company. The director is obliged to do whatever may be reasonably required of him to ensure the organ concerned is given a real opportunity to discuss the resignation. If the director does not fulfill their duties and the resignation is not discussed, their tenure will not end. The end of the tenure cannot always be conditioned by convening the general meeting or placing the discussion of the resignation on the agenda. If a director cannot be rightfully required to summon the general meeting,...
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:nusl.cz/oai:invenio.nusl.cz:329805 |
| Date | January 2013 |
| Creators | Oulíková, Lenka |
| Contributors | Čech, Petr, Zahradníčková, Marie |
| Source Sets | Czech ETDs |
| Language | Czech |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess |
Page generated in 0.0025 seconds