<div>
<div>
<div>
<p>Approximately 60% of lean manufacturing systems result in failure (Pearce & Pons,
2019). The failures are attributed to a lack of understanding of lean principles and a lack
of commitment by employees (Almanei, Salonitis, & Tsinopoulos, 2018). The study
hypothesized that incorporating augmented reality (AR) into the processes, would
improve the overall success rate. An AR proof of concept was conducted using the
Toshiba dynaEdge AR100 (Dynabook, 2019). The question that guided the proof of
concept was, “how did instructional task times compare between AR instruction’s and
paper instruction’s?” The literature review provided findings that the incorporation of AR
contributing to a 33% decrease in fabrication cycle times (Segovia et al., 2015). The
literature review also provided findings that AR incorporation worked best for complex
assembly tasks (Capozzi, Lorizzo, Modoni, & Sacco, 2014). The study utilized 20
subjects, which were split evenly into two groups for each set of instructions. The 20
individuals were timed, and the data was analyzed using a two-sample t-test and a Cohen’s
d effect size analysis. The AR system’s perceived usability was also analyzed through the
use of a system usability scale (SUS). The study’s findings for the t-test and the effect size
analysis did not support the previously stated hypothesis. However, the AR system was
determined to be useful, based off of the SUS findings. The study provides future
researchers a starting point for AR related studies and an understanding of what to avoid.
</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:purdue.edu/oai:figshare.com:article/13360337 |
| Date | 14 December 2020 |
| Creators | Kenneth Deangelo Jay Jr (9755459) |
| Source Sets | Purdue University |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Text, Thesis |
| Rights | CC BY 4.0 |
| Relation | https://figshare.com/articles/thesis/The_Usage_of_Augmented_Reality_for_an_Instructional_Task/13360337 |
Page generated in 0.0028 seconds