Secular nationalism, India?s official ideology and the basis for its secular
Constitution, is being challenged by the rising religious nationalist discourses. This has
resulted in an ongoing struggle between the secular and religious nationalist discourses.
Since women are regarded as symbols of religious tradition and purity, the religious
nationalist discourses subject them to increasing rules and regulations aimed at controlling
their behavior to conform to the ideal of religious purity.
In this study I examine the subject positions that the Hindu and Muslim nationalist
discourses in India are constructing for "their women" and its implication for women's
citizenship rights. I focus my research on two topics, where religious nationalist discourses
intersect with the women's question in obvious ways. These are "the Muslim personal law"
and "marriages between Hindu women and Muslim men". The Muslim personal law has
emerged as the most important symbol of Muslim identity over the years, and holds an
important position within the Hindu and the Muslim nationalist discourses as well as the
secular discourse. The debates around the Muslim personal law are centered on questions of
religious freedom and equal citizenship rights for Muslim women. The issue of marriages between Hindu women and Muslim men is located in the Hindu nationalist discourse?s larger
theme pertaining to the threat that the Muslim "other" poses to the Hindu community/nation.
I juxtapose the religious nationalist discourses with the secular nationalist discourse
to understand how the latter is contesting and negotiating with the former two to counter the
restrictive subject positions that the religious nationalist discourses are constructing for
Hindu and Muslim women. The study is based on the content of debates taken from three
mainstream English newspapers in India. Further, interviews with people associated with
projects related to women rights and/or countering religious nationalism are used to
supplement the analysis.
The analysis is carried out using concepts from Laclau and Mouffe's discourse
theory. The analysis suggests that the subject positions being constructed by the religious
nationalist discourses for Hindu and Muslim women, although different from each other,
freeze them as subjects of religious communities, marginalizing or rejecting their identities as
subjects of State with equal citizenship rights. The women rights and secular discourse
counters this by offering a subject position with more agency and rights compared to the
former two. However, it is increasingly getting trapped within the boundaries being set by the
religious nationalist discourses. I argue that there is a need for women rights and secular
discourse to break the boundaries being set by the religious nationalist discourses. In order to
prevent the sedimentation of the meaning "women as subjects of community", the secular
discourse needs to employ the vocabulary of liberal citizenship as rearticulated in feminist,
pluralist terms.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:tamu.edu/oai:repository.tamu.edu:1969.1/ETD-TAMU-2009-12-7568 |
| Date | 2009 December 1900 |
| Creators | Imam, Zeba |
| Contributors | La Pastina, Antonio C. |
| Source Sets | Texas A and M University |
| Language | en_US |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Book, Thesis, Electronic Dissertation, text |
| Format | application/pdf |
Page generated in 0.0024 seconds