Submitted by Automa??o e Estat?stica (sst@bczm.ufrn.br) on 2017-03-14T20:56:01Z No. of bitstreams: 1 ThaisSantosNobregaVieiraGraca_DISSERT.pdf: 812431 bytes, checksum: 04c0ccafb4fbfb02224a4c77fe2fc27c (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Arlan Eloi Leite Silva (eloihistoriador@yahoo.com.br) on 2017-03-15T20:00:29Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 ThaisSantosNobregaVieiraGraca_DISSERT.pdf: 812431 bytes, checksum: 04c0ccafb4fbfb02224a4c77fe2fc27c (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-03-15T20:00:29Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ThaisSantosNobregaVieiraGraca_DISSERT.pdf: 812431 bytes, checksum: 04c0ccafb4fbfb02224a4c77fe2fc27c (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016-10-27 / Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cient?fico e Tecnol?gico (CNPq) / O presente trabalho investiga (des)usos do cl?tico em ora??es com verbos pronominais, tendo em vista a identifica??o de poss?veis motiva??es para a recorr?ncia ao uso ou n?o desse pronome. Tem por objetivos (i) aferir a frequ?ncia de uso e de aus?ncia do cl?tico em ora??es com verbos pronominais; (ii) verificar os tipos sem?nticos dos verbos que ocorrem na ora??o com verbos pronominais; (iii) identificar motiva??es cognitivas e sociointeracionais subjacentes ao uso ou n?o do cl?tico nas ora??es com verbos pronominais. Os dados de an?lise s?o ocorr?ncias em textos de uso real do Portugu?s Brasileiro extra?das do Corpus Discurso & Gram?tica, se??es Natal - RN, Juiz de Fora - MG e Rio Grande - RS. A fundamenta??o te?rica para o estudo ? a Lingu?stica Funcional Centrada no Uso, que re?ne contribui??es da Lingu?stica Funcional norte-americana, com base em Giv?n (1979, 1990), Hopper (1987), Bybee (2010), Traugott (2011), entre outros, e da Lingu?stica Cognitiva, conforme Langacker (1987), Lakoff (1987), Lakoff e Johnson (2002). Considerando as ocorr?ncias coletadas no corpus, foi poss?vel verificar que o uso do cl?tico ? superior ao seu desuso, que os verbos pronominais representam uma classe sem?ntica variada, sendo os de sentimento favorecedores ao uso do cl?tico e os de movimento relacionados ao desuso. Por fim, atestamos que os (des)usos do cl?tico pronominal tamb?m se relacionam a fatores de natureza cognitiva, a exemplo da iconicidade, economia e perspectiva??o, e comunicativa, como ? o caso da expressividade. / The present work investigates (dis)uses of the clitic pronoun in sentences with pronominal verbs. It aims to analyze the sentences formed either with the use of the clitic pronoun or without it and to identify possible motivations for the (dis)use the speaker chooses to do. In order to reach this goal, it is necessary (i) to assess the frequency of use and disuse of the clitic pronoun in sentences with pronominal verbs; (ii) to verify the semantic types of verbs that are used in the sentences with pronominal verbs and (iii) to identify social-interactional and cognitive-semantic motivations involved in the choice of the pattern used. The data used in this work are contemporary Portuguese language utterances taken from Corpus Discurso & Gram?tica, sections Natal - RN, Juiz de Fora - MG e Rio Grande - RS. The theoretical base for the study is the Usage Based Linguistics, which gathers contributions of both North American Functional Linguistics, as in Giv?n (1979, 1990), Hopper (1987), Bybee (2010), Traugott (2011), among others, and the Cognitive Linguistics, Langacker (1987), Lakoff (1987), Lakoff e Johnson (2002). Considering the occurrences found in the corpus, it was possible to identify that the use of the clitic pronoun continues to have a higher frequency than its erasure, that the pronominal verbs represent a wide semantic class, in which the sentiment verbs favors the use of clitic and motion verbs are related to disuse. Finally, we certify that the (dis)uses of the pronominal clitic are also related to cognitive factors, such as iconicity, economy and perspective, and comunicative factors, as expressitivity.