Social Validity is a concept used in behavioral intervention research. It focuses on whether the goals of treatment, the intervention techniques used, and the outcomes achieved are acceptable, relevant, and useful to the individual in treatment. The Social Validity Manual, 2e, provides background on the development of social validity, an overview of current research in social validity, and guidelines for expanding the practice of social validation. The book offers detailed information on scales and methods for measuring social validity across the goals, procedures, and effects of treatments utilized in various fields. The second edition incorporates advances in research findings and offers two new chapters on the use of social validity in the health sciences and how social validity plays an important role in increasing cultural awareness. / https://dc.etsu.edu/etsu_books/1218/thumbnail.jpg

Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Washington, 2006. / Vita. Includes bibliographical references (p. 231-243).

Canadian Trusts and Panamanian Foundations of Private Interest are generally utilized as juridical vehicles through which a creator can designate a person to hold and administer property for the benefit and enjoyment of a beneficiary. Given the similarity of application of both vehicles, and taking into consideration that they emanate from separate juridical and judicial systems, it is pertinent to analytically compare them. As can be expected, there is a significant number of aspects through which Foundations of Private Interest and a Trusts can be compared. The following comparative analysis will be centered around three aspects: Asset ownership, creation mechanisms and the requirement of properly identifying beneficiaries. Preceding the aforementioned comparative analysis, a presentation and description of both legal vehicles will be provided in order to make the comparative analysis comprehensible and hopefully useful.

Canadian Trusts and Panamanian Foundations of Private Interest are generally utilized as juridical vehicles through which a creator can designate a person to hold and administer property for the benefit and enjoyment of a beneficiary. Given the similarity of application of both vehicles, and taking into consideration that they emanate from separate juridical and judicial systems, it is pertinent to analytically compare them. As can be expected, there is a significant number of aspects through which Foundations of Private Interest and a Trusts can be compared. The following comparative analysis will be centered around three aspects: Asset ownership, creation mechanisms and the requirement of properly identifying beneficiaries. Preceding the aforementioned comparative analysis, a presentation and description of both legal vehicles will be provided in order to make the comparative analysis comprehensible and hopefully useful.

Thesis (Ph. D.) -- University of Alberta, 2010. / Title from pdf file main screen (viewed on February 1, 2010). A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Marketing, School of Business. At head of title: University of Alberta. Spring 2010. Includes bibliographical references.

Thesis (M.S.)--Brigham Young University. Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 2004. / Includes bibliographical references (p. 215-220).

Shallow foundations are used when designing subsea structures on the seafloor of deep water Gulf of Mexico. In order to design these subsea shallow foundations it is important to understand the behavior of the undrained shear strength of the shallow soils (i.e. upper ten to twenty feet of soil). The objective of this research is to analyze a database of soil data from deep water Gulf of Mexico originally produced by Cheon (2011) with a focus on shallow soils. The purpose of this analysis is to gain a better understanding of the soil and how it will be usable with regards to shallow foundation design. The methodology of this analysis involves studying raw data collected from different measurements taken to aid in the creation of design profiles of undrained shear strength versus depth. Within the existing database there are 18 locations with a high resolution of point data from in-situ tests (Halibut Vane) and non in-situ tests (Minivane and Torvane) that provide the clearest picture of undrained shear strength in the shallow region. The data shows that the design profiles originally created for these locations for deep foundations are generally not representative of the strength in the shallow region. They also show that in-situ test data show more variability than non in-situ data. There are also 25 Cone Penetration Tests in the existing database that show very high resolution data in the shallow region. These Cone Penetration Tests also indicate a crust that appears to be about 1 ft thick and exists along the edge of the continental shelf. Recommended future activities to build upon this work include re-evaluating the design profiles at these 43 locations at which high resolution studies have been performed in the shallow region, collecting these design profiles as well as any new design profiles and organizing them into a new database focused on shallow soils, generating a new generic profile base on the data within the new database, and creating a model that uses spatial variability analysis to calculate undrained shear strengths at new locations based on the data in the database. / text

Not available / text

No description available.

No description available.