Thesis (M.S.)--University of Wisconsin, 1968. / Extension Repository Collection. Typescript (photocopy). Includes autobiographical sketch of author. eContent provider-neutral record in process. Description based on print version record. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 76-78).

Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Wisconsin--Madison, 1968. / Extension Repository Collection. Typescript. Vita. eContent provider-neutral record in process. Description based on print version record. Includes bibliographical references.

Thesis (M.S.)--University of Wisconsin, 1962. / Extension Repository Collection. Typescript (carbon copy). Biographical sketch. eContent provider-neutral record in process. Description based on print version record. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 117-118).

Thesis (M.S.)--University of Wisconsin, 1967. / Extension Repository Collection. Typescript (photocopy). eContent provider-neutral record in process. Description based on print version record. Includes bibliographical references (leaves [87]-88).

Thesis (M.S.)--University of Wisconsin, 1965. / Extension Repository Collection. Typescript (photocopy). Vita. eContent provider-neutral record in process. Description based on print version record. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 123-125).

Thesis (M.S.)--University of Wisconsin, 1967. / Extension Repository Collection. Typescript (carbon copy). Vita. eContent provider-neutral record in process. Description based on print version record. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 66-68).

Thesis (M.S.)--University of Wisconsin, 1956. / Extension Repository Collection. Typescript (carbon copy). Vita. eContent provider-neutral record in process. Description based on print version record. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 81-82).

Hannover, Universiẗat, Diss., 2000.

No description available.

Cette recherche doctorale questionne le lien entre innovation et développement territorial, du point de vue de ses attributs, dans lecontexte de deux régions d’Europe qualifiées de périphériques et maritimes. Prenant appui sur une approche majoritairement qualitative, elle permet de placer les actions publiques du niveau régional au sein d’une prise en charge multi-niveaux de l’innovation. Elle étudie les relations de cet échelon avec les autres représentants de la triple hélice de l’innovation (secteur privé et de la recherche). Une nouvelle modélisation de leurs interactions est proposée. Pluridisciplinaire, appuyée sur un travail exhaustif de mise à plat de définitions, cette recherche s’inscrit dans l’approche en termes de milieu innovateur et mobilise, en outre, les cadres d’analyse de l’encastrement et du néo-institutionnalisme pour montrer l’importance du contexte en matière d’action publique liée aux activités innovantes. On préconise, entre autres, que la Région se positionne en milieu de terrain dans le jeu de l’innovation. Cela lui permet de transformer les contraintes liées à la périphéricité et à lamaritimité en atouts et ainsi de se faire pleinement reconnaître comme innovante. Sa vision large du jeu lui offre aussi l’opportunité de ne pas tomber dans le mainstream de l’action publique destinée au soutien des seuls acteurs innovants, pour mieux s’adresser à toutes les composantes de la société régionale. Elle est ainsi mieux à même de soutenir l’innovation, au bénéfice de son territoire / This doctoral study questions the link between innovation and territorialdevelopment, from its attributes’ point of view, in the context of two regions of Europe designated as peripheral and maritime. Based on a predominantly qualitative approach, it makes it possible to place the regional level public actions with in a multilevel innovation support. It studies this level’s relationships with the other representatives of the triple helix of innovation (private and research sectors). A new modeling of their interactions is proposed. Multidisciplinary, based on an exhaustive work on definitions, this study is part of the innovative milieus’ approach, and also mobilizes the analysis frameworks of embeddedness and neo-institutionalism to show the significance off the context regarding public action related to innovative activities. We advocate, among other recommendations, the Region to position itself as mid-field player in the game of innovation. This allows it to transform the constraints related to peripherality and maritimity into assets and thus to be recognized as fully innovative. Its broad vision off the game also offers the opportunity not to fail into the public action’s mainstream intended to support innovative players only, by better addressing all the components off the regional society. It is thus better able to support innovation, for its territory’s benefit