本研究為新竹縣國民中學主任培訓之研究。旨在瞭解國民中學學校人員對培訓目標及實施方式、培訓課程運作內涵及對國中主任專業能力知覺之看法，探討其關係，進而依研究結果提出建議。 　　首先進行文獻探討，作為架構研究的理論基礎；接著，實地訪談2位培訓業務專家;問卷調查325位學校人員(新竹縣共發出325份問卷，可用問卷311份，可用率為96%)以分析看法、驗證理論；最後，依研究結果進行討論與結論建議。研究主要發現如下： 一、主任培訓目標及實施方式、課程運作內涵及專業能力的看法： （一）主任培訓目標包括熟悉行政管理實務、整合處室發展方向、培養教育專業責任能力、具有教學領導的能力、發展公共關係、陶冶博雅通識知能五個向度；其整體、分向度得分均為中上，其中以熟悉行政管理實務得分最高。主任培訓實施方式包括實務模擬演練、案例研討、師傅經驗傳承、學校實習、分組討論活動、國內教育機構參訪、歷程檔案建置、多元評量、讀書會、心得(活動、專書)報告、國外教育機構參訪、講述法、網路研討、童軍活動(木章基訓)、班會等方式；其整體、分向度得分均為中上，其中以實務模擬演練的方式得分最高。 （二）主任培訓課程運作內涵包活實務實習課程、師傅教導課程、博雅通識課程、專業培育課程四向度；其整體、分向度得分均為中上，其中以實務實習課程得分最高。 （三）主任培訓專業能力包括行政管理能力專業、處室發展能力專業、專業責任能力專業、教學領導能力專業、公共關係能力專業五向度；其整體、分向度得分均為中上，其中以知覺行政管理能力專業得分最高。 二、不同背景變項在培訓目標及實施方式、課程運作內涵及主任專業能力得分差異情形： （一）不同背景變項在主任培訓目標及培訓實施方式得分方面：研究發現年齡、最高學歷、服務年資、現任職務有顯著差異，性別、擔任主任年資、學校規模、學校所在地、培訓地點沒有顯著差異。 （二）不同背景變項在課程運作內涵得分方面：研究發現年齡、服務年資有顯著差異，性別、最高學歷、現任職務、擔任主任年資、學校規模、學校所在地、培訓地點沒有顯著差異。 （三）不同背景變項在主任專業能力得分方面：研究發現年齡、服務年資、現任職務、學校規模有顯著差異，性別、最高學歷、擔任主任年資、學校所在地、培訓地點沒有顯著差異。 三、培訓目標及實施方式、課程運作內涵對主任專業能力的預測情形： 　　培訓目標及實施方式之培訓目標對整體主任專業能力有顯著的預測力；培訓課程運作內涵之專業培育課程、實務實習課程、博雅通識課程對整體主任專業能力有顯著的預測力。最後，本研究根據研究的發現，提出相關建議，俾供教育行政機關、接受培訓人員及後續研究之參考。 / The main purpose of this research was to investigate the director preparation goal setting and preparation method, director professional preparation curriculum and director professional competency. The study included literature analysis, survey method with an interview, and survey method with a questionnaire. The purpose of survey method with 2 specialists were aimed to explore the opinions of specialists. The research instrument was distributed to 325 junior high school principals、directors and teachers in Hsinchu county and 311 valid samples were used in this study（response rate was 96%）. The data obtained were interpreted using description statistics, t-test, correlation and ANOVA, Scheffé posteriori comparison, and content analysis. Based on the statistics analysis of the questionnaire, this study finds reaches the following results: A. In the aspect of director preparation goal setting and preparation method: 1.The director preparation goal setting include five parts:(1)professional administrative management,(2)group development direction,(3)professional responsibility,(4)instruction leadership,(5)public relationship. The perception of principals, directors and teachers were above average agreement of the five parts. For directors, the best dimension is “professional administrative management”. The preparation method include fifteen parts：(1)imitate practice,(2)case investigates,(3) mentor,(4)school practice,(5)divide into groups discussion campaign,(6)domestic educational organization visit,(7)course files build,(8)multivariate comment,(9)reading meeting,(10) the report of study (activities and special books),(11)foreign educational organization visit,(12)speech,(13)network investigate,(14)military campaign( wooden chapter base standard),(15)the square types such as class meeting. The perception of principals, directors and teachers were above average agreement of the fifteen parts. For directors, the best dimension is “imitate practice”. 2. Teachers’ age, highest educational degree, years of service and position of service have significant influences on director preparation goal setting and preparation method. But teachers’ sexual, years of director service, school size, places do not have any significant influences. B. In the aspect of director professional preparation curriculum: 1.The director professional preparation curriculum include four parts: (1) intern,(2)mentor,(3)leadership,(4)professional preparation. The perception of principals, directors and teachers were above average agreement of the four parts. For directors, the best dimension is“intern”. 2. Teachers’ age and years of service have significant influences on director professional preparation curriculum. But teachers’ sexual, highest educational degree, position of service, years of director service, school size, places do not have any significant influences. C. In the aspect of director professional competency: 1.The director professional competency include five parts: (1)professional administrative management,(2)group development direction,(3)professional responsibility,(4)instruction leadership,(5)public relationship. The perception of principals, directors and teachers were above average agreement of the five parts. For directors, the best dimension is“professional administrative management competency”. 2. Teachers’ age, years of service, position of service and school size have significant influences on director professional preparation curriculum. But teachers’ sexual, highest educational degree, years of director service, places do not have any significant influences. D. In the aspect of relationships among the director preparation goal setting and preparation method, director professional preparation curriculum and director professional competency: 1. There was positive correlation and regression existed among the director preparation goal setting and preparation method, director professional preparation curriculum and director professional competency. 2. Directors’ preparation goal setting and preparation method, director professional preparation curriculum did promote director professional competency In the last part, based on the research results, the researcher proposed some suggestions for educational administrative agencies, directors and researchers, hoping to benefit the junior high school education in the future.