過去台灣對於國會聯絡人的研究，多屬於國會聯絡人所發揮的功能及扮演的角色或是相關工作績效評估方面，缺乏針對國會聯絡人養成過程的討論，在我國的憲政體制所造成的權力分立下，為了使行政與立法間溝通聯繫順暢並降低互動過程中的衝突，行政機關的國會聯絡人扮演了關鍵性的角色，故在挑選國會聯絡人及對新進國會聯絡人養成訓練上，各機關皆相當重視，而師徒制運用於行政機關國會聯絡人養成上的現象相當普遍，值得從師徒制所產生的影響進行深入研究。 本研究是以深度訪談法為主，並輔以文獻分析法及參與觀察法的質性研究，透過立意抽樣方式，選擇8個行政機關共16位資淺、資深之國會聯絡人員為研究對象進行研究。 針對訪談內容、觀察現象並相關文獻歸納與分析研究的結果，本研究提出主要結論有三點，首先，從歸納訪談的結果來看，行政機關在新進的國會聯絡人組織養成過程中，透過資深同仁擔任師父角色的經驗傳授，徒弟有了遵循準則，且師父好的行為表現轉移徒弟身上，國會聯絡工作易上手，但是徒弟必須有積極進取的態度及不能一昧承襲缺點，食古不化，才能順利完成任務；其次，師徒在互相教導與學習過程中，因為滿足雙方的需求而效果良好，在工作上有好的績效表現，容易獲得升遷機會與好名聲，就算有一天互換角色後，也會傳承教導與學習的風氣，但若未達師徒間特質及能力要求，教導與學習效果降低，會對自己與組織造成負面影響；最後，在樂於知識分享的組織文化下，組織成員無法透過言語表達的默會知識得以透過「做中學」方式傳遞，共同為組織良好績效努力，組織也要避免成員有自利主義，若知識藏私不願意分享，將危害到整個組織。 / There are many studies on the issue of- “Congressional Liaison.”-Previous studies have focused on their function, liaison’s roles or performance, there are lacking of congressional liaison’s training and mentoring. Due to the separation of powers, legislature and executive are independent but strongly associated with each other. Thus, congressional liaison is a crucial bridge to maintain communication and tackle the conflicts between parliament and agencies. Governmental agencies requires establishing functioning congressional liaison’s mentor relationship, but how the knowledge and insight of congressional liaison works be trained and passing on within the agencies is an interesting question waiting to be answered . This study utilized in-depth interview, literature review and participant observation to do the research. By purposive sampling, author chose 16 junior and senior congressional liaisons from 8 executive agencies as interviewers. This study concludes following three observations. First, executive agencies tend to establish a mentorship for new members to get familiar with their job. Interviews show that if following the instructions and mentor’s standard, protégé is easier to be trained into a good liaison officer. Moreover, protégé will have more positive attitudes and be more flexible to accomplish the missions. Secondly, through mentoring protégés, mentors can perform better and are likely to get the reputation and promotion. When protégés become mentors, they are more liable to proceed with mentorship. On the contrary, if the mentors are not able to do the mentoring job well, not only the learning efficiency will be low, but the malfunctioning relationship have organizational consequences. However, during the process of coaching and learning, mentors and protégés can be beneficial from each other. Lastly, because of the knowledge sharing and organizational culture, members could implement the concept of “learn by doing” to deliver the tacit knowledge. Also, organization should avoid members from being too egoism, once they are unwilling to share or interchanging the experiences, it is might be harmful to the organizations.