住宅開發型態之決定，除考量住宅市場的需求外，尚需考量土地市場的供給。在臺北市單筆土地面積偏小之情況下，開發者若欲進行開發，整合土地之能力將成為影響開發規模之重要因素。然而，土地之產權型態、地主行為及偏好等因素，將影響開發者的整合成本。開發者往往因基地面積之限制而變更設計，甚或放棄開發。再者，影響住宅供給之重要因素除基地面積外，亦與開發強度息息相關。因此，在土地稀少、產權複雜或地價較高之地區，開發者應會增加單位土地的資本投入量以實現規模經濟。此外，在現行法規下，開發案若符合特定標準，即可申請政策性容積獎勵，使開發強度得以超過法定容積率之限制，進而影響最終之住宅開發型態與供給數量。為印證以上之推論，本研究以臺北市民國83年至104年第三種住宅區新建住宅之使用執造為基礎，建立開發個案之資料庫。先以敘述統計及地域型空間自相關分析開發型態，結果顯示：臺北市各行政區住宅開發型態各異，且產生空間聚集之情況。整體來看，市區主要為小基地、高容積之開發型態；而郊區開發量體較大，且偏向大基地、低容積之開發型態。 再者，本研究以多元線性迴歸模型探討影響基地面積與實際容積率之因素。實證結果顯示：影響住宅基地規模之關鍵為產權條件與整合因素，且市場中的確出現土地與資本替代的情形；而政策性容積獎勵增加了替代之彈性，亦可能降低土地整合之需要。此外，為了更深入了解產權條件與開發型態間之關聯，本研究進一步將臺北市十二個行政區劃分為原單筆土地面積較小之「產權複雜區」及原單筆土地面積較大之「產權單純區」，與實際開發案之土地筆數、面積及實際容積率進行交叉分析。結果指出：相對於產權單純之地區，產權複雜地區的開發土地面積較小，且開發者將更加強土地利用之強度，使建案呈現小基地、高容積之垂直發展型態。本研究之實證結果可以印證：產權複雜增加土地整合之成本，因此開發者需透過加強土地利用，增加經濟樓高，以達土地使用之規模經濟。而若欲擴大資本開發規模，與其進行成本較高之土地整合，開發者將傾向申請政策性容積獎勵。 / The pattern of housing development is decided by the needs of the housing market, as well as the supply of land. The plots in Taipei are overall small in size. Thus for developers, land assembly is an important factor that affects the development scale. Property rights, landlord behavior and preferences will affect the cost of land assembly, and force the developers to change design or even give up development due to the constraint of building sites size. Furthermore, important factors of the housing supply not only include the size of building sites, but also the building density. In areas where the land supply is inelastic, land prices tend to be high or property rights are complex, developers will therefore need to increase the amount of capital investment per unit of land in order to achieve economies of scale. In addition, if development projects meet certain requirements, developers can apply for floor area bonus that enable the building density to exceed the original legal limit of the floor-to-site ratio, thereby affecting the development patterns and the amount of housing supply. To verify these arguments, this study established a database of housing projects based on residential usage licenses from 1994 to 2015, and then used descriptive statistics and local spatial autocorrelation statistics to analyze housing development patterns. Results showed that development patterns varied from district to district and presented spatial clustering. On the whole, the site size was small and the building density was high in downtown area. In contrast the site size in the suburbs was relatively big, the building density was comparatively low and the amount of development was large. Furthermore, this study used regression models to explore factors affecting the size of building sites and the building density. The results showed that the key factors affecting the size of building sites were property rights and land assembly. Moreover, substitution between land and capital does occur. Nevertheless, floor area bonus increased the elasticity of substitution, and sometimes also reduced the incentive for land assembly. In order to better understand the correlation between property rights and development patterns, this study divided the twelve administrative districts of Taipei into "complex property areas" where individual plots were small, and "simple property areas" where individual plots were big, then analyzed the site size, number of land parcels and building density. The results pointed out that compared with the "simple property area", the site size was relatively small in the "complex property area", and developers would raise the intensity of land use. In consequence, buildings in "complex property area" tended to be on small sites with high density. The empirical results of this study suggested that complex property rights increased the cost of land assembly, and that led developers to increase the building density in order to achieve economies of scale of land use. However, if developers wish to create more floor areas, they tended to apply for floor area bonus rather than choose the costly land assembly.

在我國土地開發市場中，開發者應偏好整合坵塊、以大面積土地進行開發，惟相關報導指出臺北市近年以狹小基地開發之鳥籠建案有所增加，遂形成實際與預期不符的矛盾情況。本文從土地供給角度出發，認為除了地價昂貴之外，土地整合成本亦對開發基地規模有決定性的影響，且由於容積獎勵制度的施行，當開發者取得大小足以開發的土地後，可能不再進行土地整合、而改以資本替代之。 為驗證上述推測，本研究以民國83至102年第三種住宅區新建住宅之使用執照存根為基礎，建立開發個案之資料庫；並利用集群分析方法，對開發個案之土地、資本配置型態進行歸納。經過統計，歷年均有近40%的新建住宅屬於基地狹小之鳥籠建案，且集群分析實證結果指出在空間上，市中心至郊區的住宅開發型態呈現單獨小規模開發至整合大規模開發的遞移變化，代表土地整合的難題已長期存在於臺北市住宅開發市場中，其中又以土地較零碎的市中心更為明顯。 此外，本文另以基地面積、公告現值與政策虛擬變數對實際容積率進行線性迴歸，結果顯示整併土地確實有提升容積總樓地板面積的規模經濟效果，但效果卻不如政策性容積獎勵來得明顯；且經過模擬亦得知若欲達到同樣的樓地板面積增量，申請政策性獎勵所需的成本將遠低於進行土地整合。是以在取得合理規模之基地後，土地整合已非必要，再加上多樣化卻缺乏總量管制的容積獎勵，開發者將傾向透過政策性手段來達到擴大資本開發規模之目的，遂造成住宅開發型態呈現空間垂直的成長。 / In Taiwan, land developers are expected to prefer assembling small plots into a large lot for development. However, it is widely reported recently that development projects of building on a small plot have been increasing in Taipei. This phenomenon is inconsistent with the above expectation. From the perspective of land supply, this study argues that apart from land prices, costs of land assembly also have a decisive influence on the lot size for land developments. Also, because of the bulk reward regulations, developers might be less willing to conduct land assembly. Instead, they choose capital intensive means which presented as building high-rise housings once they obtain a site. To verify the argument, this study establishes a database of housing projects based on the residential usage licenses from 1994 to 2013, and observes allocation patterns of land and capital by using cluster analysis. Statistically, there are about 40% of housing projects that were built on plots smaller than 330 m2 every year. The empirical result of cluster analysis shows that housing development patterns change from downtown to suburbs. In downtown area, most developers build houses on a small single plot. However, they assemble plots to get a bigger site in the suburbs. It means that housing development market of Taipei has been entangled by land assembly problems for a long time. This issue explicitly exists in downtown area where lands are much more fragmented. In addition, this study uses site area, current land value and a policy dummy as independent variables and building density as dependent variable to conduct a linear regression. The result shows that, although land assembly increases the floor area, its effect is not as large as that of policy incentives. Based on this result, the comparison analysis of land assembly and policy incentives also points out that the application of bulk reward costs less than land assembly, while they can enjoy the same floor area. Therefore, it is believed that developers tend to choose increasing housing scale by applying bonuses instead of assembling lands. This trend makes the housing development forms vertically expand consequently.